» Articles » PMID: 23073926

Biomechanical Concept and Clinical Outcome of Dual Mobility Cups

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Oct 18
PMID 23073926
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dual mobility cup systems in total hip arthroplasty consist of a metal back with a non-constrained liner, in which a constrained standard head articulates. While superior stability of such implants in comparison with standard total hip replacements is assumed, it is the purpose of this study to outline the biomechanical concept of dual mobility cups and to describe implant survival and dislocation rate based on the series published in the English-speaking and Francophone literature. A growing body of evidence indicates reduced dislocation rates in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty and in selected tumour cases. The limited availability of studies evaluating long-term implant survival and existing concerns with regard to increased wear rates and aseptic loosening, leads to the conclusion that such implants have to be used with prudence, particularly in standard primary hip arthroplasty and in young patients.

Citing Articles

Cemented dual mobility cup for primary total hip arthroplasty: survival and quality of life. A multicenter study.

Rincon J, de la Pava C, Velandia R, Munoz-Medina S, Ferreira A SICOT J. 2025; 11:14.

PMID: 40079608 PMC: 11905767. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2025006.


Removing Cemented Dual Mobility Liners From Acetabular Components: A Technical Tip for a Challenging Surgical Problem.

Wilson J, Mika A, Martin J Arthroplast Today. 2023; 23:101211.

PMID: 37781023 PMC: 10541465. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101211.


Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle.

Tauviqirrahman M, Ammarullah M, Jamari J, Saputra E, Winarni T, Kurniawan F Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3564.

PMID: 36864170 PMC: 9981612. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30725-6.


Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Ciolli G, Mesnard G, Deroche E, Gunst S, Batailler C, Servien E J Pers Med. 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36675742 PMC: 9867154. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010081.


Which femoral neck for a dual mobility cup? A biomechanical evaluation.

Wegrzyn J, Longaray J, Baez R, Herrera L Int Orthop. 2022; 46(8):1783-1793.

PMID: 35570206 PMC: 9349148. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05415-z.


References
1.
Mohammed R, Cnudde P . Severe metallosis owing to intraprosthetic dislocation in a failed dual-mobility cup primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(3):493.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.019. View

2.
Corbett K, Losina E, Nti A, Prokopetz J, Katz J . Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2010; 5(10):e13520. PMC: 2958142. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013520. View

3.
COVENTRY M . Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67(6):832-41. View

4.
Sariali E, Lazennec J, Khiami F, Catonne Y . Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop. 2009; 80(3):277-82. PMC: 2823207. DOI: 10.3109/17453670902988378. View

5.
Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, Gabrion A, Mertl P . Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years' follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011; 97(1):8-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.08.003. View