» Articles » PMID: 23073680

Electrical Stimulation Therapy of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter is Successful in Treating GERD: Final Results of Open-label Prospective Trial

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Oct 18
PMID 23073680
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) improves LES pressure without interfering with LES relaxation. The aim of this open-label pilot trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term LES stimulation using a permanently implanted LES stimulator in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods: GERD patients who were at least partially responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with abnormal esophageal pH, hiatal hernia ≤ 3 cm, and esophagitis ≤ LA grade C were included. Bipolar stitch electrodes were placed in the LES and an IPG was placed in a subcutaneous pocket. Electrical stimulation was delivered at 20 Hz, 215 μs, 3-8 mA in 30 min sessions. The number and timing of sessions was tailored to each patient's GERD profile. Patients were evaluated using GERD-HRQL, daily symptom and medication diaries, SF-12, esophageal pH, and high-resolution manometry.

Results: 24 patients (mean age = 53 years, SD = 12 years; 14 men) were implanted; 23 completed their 6-month evaluation. Median GERD-HRQL scores at 6 months was 2.0 (IQR = 0-5.5) and was significantly better than both baseline on-PPI [9.0 (range = 6.0-10.0); p < 0.001] and off-PPI [23 (21-25); p < 0.001] GERD-HRQL. Median% 24-h esophageal pH < 4.0 at baseline was 10.1 and improved to 5.1 at 6 months (p < 0.001). At their 6-month follow-up, 91 % (21/23) of the patients were off PPI and had significantly better median GERD-HRQL on LES stimulation compared to their on-PPI GERD-HRQL at baseline (9.0 vs. 2.0; p < 0.001). There were no unanticipated implantation- or stimulation-related adverse events or untoward sensation due to stimulation. There were no reports of treatment-related dysphagia, and manometric swallow was also unaffected.

Conclusions: Electrical stimulation of the LES is safe and effective for treating GERD. There is a significant and sustained improvement in GERD symptoms, esophageal pH, and reduction in PPI usage without any side effects with the therapy. Furthermore, the therapy can be optimized to address an individual patient's disease.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)-Is There Something Between PPI and Fundoplication? An Overview.

Rosen H, Sebesta Jr C, Sebesta M, Sebesta C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860368 PMC: 11766380. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020362.


Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update.

Nabi Z, Inavolu P, Duvvuru N World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(9):1096-1107.

PMID: 38577183 PMC: 10989487. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096.


Neuromodulation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.

Woo J, Pikov V, Chen J J Transl Gastroenterol. 2023; 1(1):47-56.

PMID: 38009094 PMC: 10673618.


Anti-reflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Garg R, Mohammed A, Singh A, Schleicher M, Thota P, Rustagi T Endosc Int Open. 2022; 10(6):E854-E864.

PMID: 35692929 PMC: 9187426. DOI: 10.1055/a-1802-0220.


Barrett's Esophagus and Intestinal Metaplasia.

Zhang L, Sun B, Zhou X, Wei Q, Liang S, Luo G Front Oncol. 2021; 11:630837.

PMID: 34221959 PMC: 8252963. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.630837.


References
1.
Vakil N, van Zanten S, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R . The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(8):1900-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x. View

2.
Bonavina L, DeMeester T, Fockens P, Dunn D, Saino G, Bona D . Laparoscopic sphincter augmentation device eliminates reflux symptoms and normalizes esophageal acid exposure: one- and 2-year results of a feasibility trial. Ann Surg. 2010; 252(5):857-62. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd879b. View

3.
Stefanidis D, Hope W, Kohn G, Reardon P, Richardson W, Fanelli R . Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(11):2647-69. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1267-8. View

4.
Rothstein R . Endoscopic therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease: outcomes of the randomized-controlled trials done to date. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42(5):594-602. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31816bcde5. View

5.
Spechler S, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal R, Hirano I, Ramirez F . Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285(18):2331-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331. View