» Articles » PMID: 23071709

Physician Care Patterns and Adherence to Postpartum Glucose Testing After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Oregon

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Oct 17
PMID 23071709
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study examines obstetrician/gynecologists and family medicine physicians' reported care patterns, attitudes and beliefs and predictors of adherence to postpartum testing in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Research Design And Methods: In November-December 2005, a mailed survey went to a random, cross-sectional sample of 683 Oregon licensed physicians in obstetrician/gynecologists and family medicine from a population of 2171.

Results: Routine postpartum glucose tolerance testing by both family physicians (19.3%) and obstetrician/gynecologists physicians (35.3%) was reportedly low among the 285 respondents (42% response rate). Factors associated with high adherence to postpartum testing included physician stated priority (OR 4.39, 95% CI: 1.69-7.94) and physician beliefs about norms or typical testing practices (OR 3.66, 95% CI: 1.65-11.69). Specialty, sex of physician, years of practice, location, type of practice, other attitudes and beliefs were not associated with postpartum glucose tolerance testing.

Conclusions: Postpartum glucose tolerance testing following a gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancy was not routinely practiced by responders to this survey. Our findings indicate that physician knowledge, attitudes and beliefs may in part explain suboptimal postpartum testing. Although guidelines for postpartum care are established, some physicians do not prioritize these guidelines in practice and do not believe postpartum testing is the norm among their peers.

Citing Articles

Follow-up after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practices.

Nielsen J, Fonager K, Kristensen J, Overgaard C BJGP Open. 2022; 6(3).

PMID: 35443978 PMC: 9680740. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0241.


The utility of diagnostic tests in the detection and prediction of glucose intolerance in the early and late postpartum period in women after gestational diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study.

Quansah D, Gross J, Mbundu-Ilunga R, Puder J Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021; 13(1):31.

PMID: 33731202 PMC: 7966915. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-021-00650-7.


Gestational Diabetes and Health Behaviors Among Women: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2014.

Gao F, Luo H, Jones K, Nicholson W, Bell R Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15:E131.

PMID: 30367717 PMC: 6219848. DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.180094.


Early versus 6-12 week postpartum glucose tolerance testing for women with gestational diabetes.

Carter E, Martin S, Temming L, Colditz G, Macones G, Tuuli M J Perinatol. 2017; 38(2):118-121.

PMID: 29048411 PMC: 5790595. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.159.


Diabetes Screening in US Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2012.

Man B, Turyk M, Kominiarek M, Xia Y, Gerber B Prev Chronic Dis. 2016; 13:E124.

PMID: 27609302 PMC: 5027851. DOI: 10.5888/pcd13.160106.


References
1.
Weaver S . New research gestational diabetes indicates risk later in life. Fam Med. 2004; 36(3):159-60. View

2.
Chin M, Cook S, Jin L, Drum M, Harrison J, Koppert J . Barriers to providing diabetes care in community health centers. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(2):268-74. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.268. View

3.
Shea A, Shah B, Clark H, Malcolm J, Walker M, Karovitch A . The effectiveness of implementing a reminder system into routine clinical practice: does it increase postpartum screening in women with gestational diabetes?. Chronic Dis Can. 2011; 31(2):58-64. View

4.
Morrison M, Collins C, Lowe J . Postnatal testing for diabetes in Australian women following gestational diabetes mellitus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49(5):494-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01056.x. View

5.
Bellamy L, Casas J, Hingorani A, Williams D . Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373(9677):1773-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5. View