» Articles » PMID: 23066524

Component Analysis of Simple Span Vs. Complex Span Adaptive Working Memory Exercises: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Oct 16
PMID 23066524
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been growing interest in using adaptive training interventions such as Cogmed-RM to increase the capacity of working memory (WM), but this intervention may not be optimally designed. For instance, Cogmed-RM can target the primary memory (PM) component of WM capacity, but not the secondary memory (SM) component. The present study hypothesized that Cogmed-RM does not target SM capacity because the simple span exercises it uses may not cause a sufficient amount of information to be lost from PM during training. To investigate, we randomly assigned participants to either a standard (simple span; N = 31) or a modified (complex span; N = 30) training condition. The main findings showed that SM capacity did not improve, even in the modified training condition. Hence, the potency of span-based WM interventions cannot be increased simply by converting simple span exercises into complex span exercises.

Citing Articles

Training-induced improvement in working memory tasks results from switching to efficient strategies.

Malinovitch T, Jakoby H, Ahissar M Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 28(2):526-536.

PMID: 33063180 PMC: 8062341. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01824-6.


Cognitive Training Deep Dive: The Impact of Child, Training Behavior and Environmental Factors within a Controlled Trial of Cogmed for Fragile X Syndrome.

Scott H, Harvey D, Li Y, McLennan Y, Johnston C, Shickman R Brain Sci. 2020; 10(10).

PMID: 32992879 PMC: 7601580. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10100671.


Brain Training in Children and Adolescents: Is It Scientifically Valid?.

Rossignoli-Palomeque T, Perez-Hernandez E, Gonzalez-Marques J Front Psychol. 2018; 9:565.

PMID: 29780336 PMC: 5946581. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00565.


Effectiveness of working memory training among children with dyscalculia: evidence for transfer effects on mathematical achievement-a pilot study.

Layes S, Lalonde R, Bouakkaz Y, Rebai M Cogn Process. 2017; 19(3):375-385.

PMID: 29273913 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0853-2.


Unmasking the component-general and component-specific aspects of primary and secondary memory in the immediate free recall task.

Gibson B, Gondoli D Mem Cognit. 2017; 46(3):349-360.

PMID: 29110210 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0769-1.


References
1.
Unsworth N, Engle R . The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychol Rev. 2007; 114(1):104-32. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104. View

2.
Kane M, Hambrick D, Tuholski S, Wilhelm O, Payne T, Engle R . The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004; 133(2):189-217. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189. View

3.
Diamond A, Lee K . Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011; 333(6045):959-64. PMC: 3159917. DOI: 10.1126/science.1204529. View

4.
Unsworth N . Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(6):1020-34. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1020. View

5.
Kane M, Engle R . The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003; 9(4):637-71. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196323. View