» Articles » PMID: 23065675

Dustiness of Fine and Nanoscale Powders

Overview
Journal Ann Occup Hyg
Date 2012 Oct 16
PMID 23065675
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dustiness may be defined as the propensity of a powder to form airborne dust by a prescribed mechanical stimulus; dustiness testing is typically intended to replicate mechanisms of dust generation encountered in workplaces. A novel dustiness testing device, developed for pharmaceutical application, was evaluated in the dustiness investigation of 27 fine and nanoscale powders. The device efficiently dispersed small (mg) quantities of a wide variety of fine and nanoscale powders, into a small sampling chamber. Measurements consisted of gravimetrically determined total and respirable dustiness. The following materials were studied: single and multiwalled carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, and carbon blacks; fumed oxides of titanium, aluminum, silicon, and cerium; metallic nanoparticles (nickel, cobalt, manganese, and silver) silicon carbide, Arizona road dust; nanoclays; and lithium titanate. Both the total and respirable dustiness spanned two orders of magnitude (0.3-37.9% and 0.1-31.8% of the predispersed test powders, respectively). For many powders, a significant respirable dustiness was observed. For most powders studied, the respirable dustiness accounted for approximately one-third of the total dustiness. It is believed that this relationship holds for many fine and nanoscale test powders (i.e. those primarily selected for this study), but may not hold for coarse powders. Neither total nor respirable dustiness was found to be correlated with BET surface area, therefore dustiness is not determined by primary particle size. For a subset of test powders, aerodynamic particle size distributions by number were measured (with an electrical low-pressure impactor and an aerodynamic particle sizer). Particle size modes ranged from approximately 300 nm to several micrometers, but no modes below 100 nm, were observed. It is therefore unlikely that these materials would exhibit a substantial sub-100 nm particle contribution in a workplace.

Citing Articles

Development of handling energy factors for use of dustiness data in exposure assessment modelling.

Fonseca A, Ribalta C, Shandilya N, Fransman W, Jensen K Ann Work Expo Health. 2024; 68(3):295-311.

PMID: 38401569 PMC: 10941727. DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxae009.


Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Aerosol Behavior in a High Speed (Heubach) Rotating Drum Dustiness Tester.

Chen H, Jog M, Turkevich L Particuology. 2023; 72:68-80.

PMID: 37207251 PMC: 10193456. DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2022.02.010.


Understanding toxicity associated with boron nitride nanotubes: Review of toxicity studies, exposure assessment at manufacturing facilities, and read-across.

Kodali V, Roberts J, Glassford E, Gill R, Friend S, Dunn K J Mater Res. 2023; 37(24):4620-4638.

PMID: 37193295 PMC: 10174278. DOI: 10.1557/s43578-022-00796-8.


Numerical Investigation of Aerosolization in the Venturi Dustiness Tester: Aerodynamics of a Particle on a Hill.

Palakurthi N, Ghia U, Turkevich L J Fluids Eng. 2022; 144(6).

PMID: 35673360 PMC: 9170177. DOI: 10.1115/1.4054099.


Evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of carbon nanotube and carbon nanofiber aerosols.

Dahm M, Evans D, Bertke S, Grinshpun S Aerosol Sci Technol. 2022; 53(8):958-970.

PMID: 35392279 PMC: 8985588. DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1618437.


References
1.
Birch M, Ku B, Evans D, Ruda-Eberenz T . Exposure and emissions monitoring during carbon nanofiber production--Part I: elemental carbon and iron-soot aerosols. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011; 55(9):1016-36. PMC: 4689224. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mer073. View

2.
Turkevich L, Fernback J, Dastidar A, Osterberg P . Potential Explosion Hazard of Carbonaceous Nanoparticles: Screening of Allotropes. Combust Flame. 2016; 167:218-227. PMC: 4959120. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.010. View

3.
Pensis I, Mareels J, Dahmann D, Mark D . Comparative evaluation of the dustiness of industrial minerals according to European standard EN 15051, 2006. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 54(2):204-16. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep077. View

4.
Heitbrink W, Baron P, Willeke K . An investigation of dust generation by free falling powders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992; 53(10):617-24. DOI: 10.1080/15298669291360256. View

5.
Plinke M, Maus R, Leith D . Experimental examination of factors that affect dust generation by using Heubach and MRI testers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992; 53(5):325-30. DOI: 10.1080/15298669291359726. View