» Articles » PMID: 23064683

Microanatomy of the Spermatic Cords During Microsurgical Inguinal Varicocelectomy: Initial Experience in Asian Men

Overview
Journal Asian J Androl
Specialty Urology
Date 2012 Oct 16
PMID 23064683
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The microanatomy of the inguinal spermatic cords has never been reported in Asia. The purpose of this study was to describe the number and relationship of the veins, arteries and lymphatics in the spermatic cord and to clarify the location of the vas deferens in Asian men. Fifty-one patients receiving 79 primary microsurgical varicocelectomies performed by a single surgeon from April 2011 to July 2012 were studied. The number of internal and external spermatic veins, testicular arteries and lymphatic channels preserved during the inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy were recorded. The relationship between the right and left vascular anatomy during bilateral varicocelectomies was evaluated. The data showed that mean numbers of 1.5±0.9 arteries, 5.6±2.2 spermatic veins and 3.6±1.9 lymphatics were identified during the repairs. The internal spermatic arteries were surrounded by a dense complex of adherent veins in 81.2% of the cases. The external spermatic vein or veins were found in 60.8% of the cases. The vas deferens may be contained within the internal spermatic fascia. The results suggest that the number of veins may be highly variable and less than those reported in the English literature, but there is some similarity in the inguinal microanatomy of the right and left spermatic cords. Further research is warranted to clarify our results.

Citing Articles

Effects of Systolic Blood Pressure Elevation on Internal Sperm Artery Identification During Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy.

Kebing Y, Chenglu W, Xiaobo X, Tiliwalidi A, Liao Z Am J Mens Health. 2024; 18(4):15579883241265071.

PMID: 39066591 PMC: 11289806. DOI: 10.1177/15579883241265071.


Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery varicocelectomy versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation: A meta-analysis.

Li M, Wang Z, Li H J Int Med Res. 2016; 44(5):985-993.

PMID: 27688686 PMC: 5536546. DOI: 10.1177/0300060516659824.


Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference?.

Zhang H, Liu X, Yang X, Huang W, Ruan X, Xiao H Asian J Androl. 2013; 16(1):112-4.

PMID: 24369142 PMC: 3901867. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.122189.

References
1.
Abdel-Meguid T, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi H . Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011; 59(3):455-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.008. View

2.
Ramasamy R, Schlegel P . Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery. Urology. 2006; 68(6):1323-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1113. View

3.
Hopps C, Lemer M, Schlegel P, Goldstein M . Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 2003; 170(6 Pt 1):2366-70. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000097400.67715.f8. View

4.
Goldstein M, Gilbert B, Dicker A, Dwosh J, Gnecco C . Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992; 148(6):1808-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37035-0. View

5.
Jarow J, Sharlip I, Belker A, Lipshultz L, Sigman M, Thomas A . Best practice policies for male infertility. J Urol. 2002; 167(5):2138-44. View