» Articles » PMID: 23060734

Geographic Differences in Inter-individual Variability of Human Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter

Overview
Date 2012 Oct 13
PMID 23060734
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human exposure to fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is associated with short and long term adverse health effects. The amount of ambient PM(2.5) that infiltrates indoor locations such as residences depends on air exchange rate (ACH), penetration factor, and deposition rate. ACH varies by climate zone and thus by geographic location. Geographic variability in the ratio of exposure to ambient concentration is estimated based on comparison of three modeling domains in different climate zones: (1) New York City; (2) Harris County in Texas, and (3) a six-county domain along the I-40 corridor in North Carolina. Inter-individual variability in exposure to PM(2.5) was estimated using the Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation for Particulate Matter (SHEDS-PM) model. ACH is distinguishably the most sensitive input for both ambient and nonambient exposure to PM(2.5). High ACH leads to high ambient exposure indoors but lower non-ambient exposure, and vice versa. For summer, the average ratio of exposure to ambient concentration varies by 13 percent among the selected domains, mainly because of differences in housing stock, climate zone, and seasonal ACH. High daily average exposures for some individuals are mainly caused by non-ambient exposure to smoking or cooking. The implications of these results for interpretation of epidemiological studies are discussed.

Citing Articles

A framework for estimating the US mortality burden of fine particulate matter exposure attributable to indoor and outdoor microenvironments.

Azimi P, Stephens B J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018; 30(2):271-284.

PMID: 30518794 PMC: 7039807. DOI: 10.1038/s41370-018-0103-4.


Probabilistic estimation of residential air exchange rates for population-based human exposure modeling.

Baxter L, Stallings C, Smith L, Burke J J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016; 27(2):227-234.

PMID: 27553990 PMC: 6733390. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2016.49.


Comparing exposure metrics for the effects of fine particulate matter on emergency hospital admissions.

Mannshardt E, Sucic K, Jiao W, Dominici F, Frey H, Reich B J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013; 23(6):627-36.

PMID: 23942393 PMC: 3805672. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2013.39.


Assessment of inter-individual, geographic, and seasonal variability in estimated human exposure to fine particles.

Jiao W, Frey H, Cao Y Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(22):12519-26.

PMID: 23095102 PMC: 3658126. DOI: 10.1021/es302803g.


Time series analysis of personal exposure to ambient air pollution and mortality using an exposure simulator.

Chang H, Fuentes M, Frey H J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012; 22(5):483-8.

PMID: 22669499 PMC: 3657344. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.53.

References
1.
Frey H, Patil S . Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal. 2002; 22(3):553-78. View

2.
Cao Y, Frey H . Assessment of interindividual and geographic variability in human exposure to fine particulate matter in environmental tobacco smoke. Risk Anal. 2010; 31(4):578-91. PMC: 3437325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01523.x. View

3.
Long C, Suh H, Catalano P, Koutrakis P . Using time- and size-resolved particulate data to quantify indoor penetration and deposition behavior. Environ Sci Technol. 2001; 35(10):2089-99. DOI: 10.1021/es001477d. View

4.
Burke J, Zufall M, Ozkaynak H . A population exposure model for particulate matter: case study results for PM(2.5) in Philadelphia, PA. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002; 11(6):470-89. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500188. View

5.
Ozkaynak H, Frey H, Burke J, Pinder R . Analysis of coupled model uncertainties in source-to-dose modeling of human exposures to ambient air pollution: A PM(2.5) case study. Atmos Environ (1994). 2009; 43(9):1641-1649. PMC: 2798576. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.008. View