» Articles » PMID: 23059495

Is the End of the T-tube Drainage Era in Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones is Coming? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2012 Oct 13
PMID 23059495
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of T-tube free (TTF) versus T-tube drainage (TTD) after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).

Background: LCBDE has been proven to be an effective and preferred treatment approach for uncomplicated choledocholithiasis, and the appropriateness of T-tube placement after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct (CBD) stones is still under debate.

Methods: A systematic literature search (PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Springer-Link, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was performed. Postoperative complications were evaluated/graded according to the modified Clavien classification. Other variables extracted including primary closures of the CBDs and the associated assistant methods, T-tube types, and placement durations. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were performed both to explore heterogeneity between studies and to assess the effects of the study qualities.

Results: A total of 956 patients from 12 studies were included. The pooled odds ratio for postoperative complications and biliary-specific complications in TTF was found to be 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38-0.91; P = 0.02], 0.62 (95% CI, 0.36-1.06; P = 0.08), respectively, when compared with TTD. Operative time and hospital stay were significantly decreased in the TTF group, with the pooled weighted mean differences being 18.84 minutes (95% CI, -27.01 to 10.67; P < 0.01) and 3.22 days (95% CI, -4.59 to 1.84; P < 0.01), respectively.

Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that among patients undergoing laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones, primary closure of the CBD alone is superior to TTD; however, there is no significant benefit in terms of primary duct closure with various internal or external drainage techniques. Further randomized controlled trials are eagerly awaited to prove these findings.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the efficacy of LTCBDE and LCBDE for common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zheng B, Lu Y, Li E, Bai Z, Zhang K, Li J Front Surg. 2025; 11():1412334.

PMID: 39845028 PMC: 11750767. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1412334.


Current Gallstone Treatment Methods, State of the Art.

Li X, Ouyang J, Dai J Diseases. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39329866 PMC: 11431374. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12090197.


The safety of not implementing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage after elective clearance of choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yin J, Wang D, He Y, Sha H, Zhang W, Huang W BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):239.

PMID: 39174997 PMC: 11342491. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02535-8.


Application of laparoscopic backtracking full-thickness continuous everting suture for non-AOSC choledocholithiasis.

Yuan B, Zhang X, Kong C, Zhang C, Li H BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):315.

PMID: 37848861 PMC: 10583331. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02222-0.


T‑tube versus internal drainage tube in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Dong H, Ke S, Zhan J, Luo M, Liu X, Li Z Exp Ther Med. 2023; 26(4):496.

PMID: 37753300 PMC: 10518648. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.12195.