» Articles » PMID: 23057146

Outcomes Following Healing Response in Older, Active Patients: a Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Technique

Overview
Journal J Knee Surg
Date 2012 Oct 13
PMID 23057146
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to document outcomes following the healing response procedure for treatment of complete, proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in a mature, active population. Healing response is an all-arthroscopic procedure that preserves the native ACL and makes use of an arthroscopic awl with a 45-degree angle to make holes in the femoral attachment of the ACL and in the body of the ACL. Patients were included in this IRB-approved study if they were > or =40 years old, had a complete proximal ACL tear, and who had healing response within 6 weeks of initial injury. In this study 48 patients (35 females, 13 males) with an average age of 51 years (range: 41 to 68 years) underwent the healing response procedure. Of these four female patients (8.9%) required subsequent ACL reconstruction. Mean time to ACL reconstruction was 34.5 months (range, 14.3 to 61.2 months). Of the 44, 41 patients (93%) had minimum of 2-year follow-up at an average of 7.6 years (range, 2.2 to 13.4 years). Average preoperative Lysholm score was 54 (range, 10 to 82) and improved to an average of 90 postoperatively (p = 0.001). Median Tegner activity scale at follow-up was 5 (range, 2 to 9). Median patient satisfaction was 10 (range, 4 to 10). Higher patient satisfaction was correlated with increased Lysholm score at follow-up (rho = 0.39, p = 0.02). Tegner activity scale was associated with postoperative Lysholm score (rho = 0.35, p = 0.04). This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the healing response procedure to allow patients to return to high levels of recreational activity and to restore knee function to normal levels. In a select group of mature patients with acute proximal ACL tears, the healing response procedure is an effective treatment technique.

Citing Articles

Primary ACL repair in a selected patient cohort: A prospective single cohort study.

Al Kindi I, Al Rawahi S, Al Ghaithi A, Al Yarubi S, Al Masakri S, Al Mutaini M J Orthop. 2024; 61:127-132.

PMID: 39492978 PMC: 11526054. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.020.


Rate of Revision Surgery and Associated Risk Factors After Primary Arthroscopic ACL Repair With Additional Suture Augmentation.

Schneider K, Theil C, Gosheger G, Weller J, Goth A, Ahlbaeumer G Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(5):23259671241244734.

PMID: 38827140 PMC: 11143819. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241244734.


Open Repair of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Peel-Off Lesion in Multiligamentous Knee Injuries Results in Good Outcomes.

Hazra S, Nath S, Garg A, Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Chandra M Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023; 5(3):e827-e832.

PMID: 37388895 PMC: 10300594. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.04.011.


Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations.

Rosslenbroich S, Achtnich A, Brodkorb C, Kosters C, Kreis C, Metzlaff S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 36983341 PMC: 10059937. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062340.


Reduced knee laxity and failure rate following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with repair for acute tears: a meta-analysis.

Migliorini F, Vecchio G, Eschweiler J, Schneider S, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N J Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 24(1):8.

PMID: 36805839 PMC: 9941413. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00688-5.