» Articles » PMID: 23053240

Adding Parasites to the Guppy-predation Story: Insights from Field Surveys

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2012 Oct 12
PMID 23053240
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies of phenotypic variation in nature often consider only a single potential selective agent. In such cases, it remains an open question as to whether variation attributed to that single measured agent might be influenced by some other unmeasured agent. Previous research has shown that phenotypic variation in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) is strongly influenced by predation regime, and we here ask whether parasitism might represent an additional important selective agent shaping this variation. We performed a field survey of 26 natural guppy populations of known predation regime in northern Trinidad. We quantified levels of parasitism of guppies by the monogenean ecotoparasite, Gyrodactylus, and examined whether this parasite was associated with guppy body size or male colour. Spatial variation in Gyrodactylus parasitism was consistent between years, and parasite prevalence was generally, but not always, higher at high-predation sites than at low-predation sites. Consistent with previous work, predation regime was related to guppy size and some aspects of male colour, whereas parasitism showed few and only minor associations with the same traits. Moreover, a consideration of parasitism did not alter any interpretations regarding associations between guppy traits and predation regimes. These results suggest that parasitism, at least as quantified in the present study, does not play a major role in shaping variation in guppy body size or colour. Nevertheless, considerable variation in these traits, even within a predation regime, suggests the likely importance of other selective agents beyond just predation regime.

Citing Articles

Putative chemical cue from infected guppies subtly alters behaviour but prior exposure decreases parasite intensity.

Di Bacco K, Scott M Parasitology. 2023; 150(5):434-445.

PMID: 36794418 PMC: 10089809. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182023000136.


Shoaling guppies evade predation but have deadlier parasites.

Walsman J, Janecka M, Clark D, Kramp R, Rovenolt F, Patrick R Nat Ecol Evol. 2022; 6(7):945-954.

PMID: 35618818 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01772-5.


Evidence for contemporary and historical gene flow between guppy populations in different watersheds, with a test for associations with adaptive traits.

Blondel L, Baillie L, Quinton J, Alemu J, Paterson I, Hendry A Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(8):4504-4517.

PMID: 31031923 PMC: 6476793. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5033.


Do replicates of independent guppy lineages evolve similarly in a predator-free laboratory environment?.

Gotanda K, Pack A, LeBlond C, Hendry A Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(1):36-51.

PMID: 30680094 PMC: 6342246. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4585.


Rapid evolution of hosts begets species diversity at the cost of intraspecific diversity.

Frickel J, Theodosiou L, Becks L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(42):11193-11198.

PMID: 28973943 PMC: 5651735. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701845114.


References
1.
Decaestecker E, De Meester L, Ebert D . In deep trouble: habitat selection constrained by multiple enemies in zooplankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(8):5481-5. PMC: 122795. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.082543099. View

2.
Endler J . Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 10(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)88956-9. View

3.
Tripathi N, Hoffmann M, Willing E, Lanz C, Weigel D, Dreyer C . Genetic linkage map of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, and quantitative trait loci analysis of male size and colour variation. Proc Biol Sci. 2009; 276(1665):2195-208. PMC: 2677598. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1930. View

4.
Harris P, Lyles A . Infections of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis and Gyrodactylus turnbulli on guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in Trinidad. J Parasitol. 1992; 78(5):912-4. View

5.
Rodd F, Hughes K, Grether G, Baril C . A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1490):475-81. PMC: 1690917. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1891. View