» Articles » PMID: 23034645

Altered Landing Mechanics in ACL-reconstructed Patients

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Oct 5
PMID 23034645
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This longitudinal study aimed to examine whether patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction show a similar landing strategy during the single-leg hop test (SLHT) postsurgery analog to that previously identified when ACL deficient. It is hypothesized that ACL-reconstructed patients demonstrate greater trunk flexion to reduce knee joint moments at the cost of postural dynamic stability at their involved leg compared to their uninvolved leg.

Methods: Ten ACL-reconstructed patients performed a bilateral SLHT 6 and 12 months after surgery. Landing mechanics were determined by means of a soft tissue artifact optimized, rigid, full-body model, and the margin of stability was quantified using an inverted pendulum approach. Knee extensor muscular strength (KS) was assessed during isometric maximal voluntary knee extension contractions.

Results: ACL-reconstructed patients showed similar landing strategies as previously reported in their ACL-deficient state. By flexing their trunk, patients repositioned the ground reaction force vector more anteriorly in relation to the joints of the lower extremity (P < 0.05) and, in doing so, were able to transfer joint moments from the knee to the adjacent joints (P < 0.05). This upper body strategy reduced the margin of stability in the ACL-reconstructed leg during landing (P < 0.05). Twelve months after surgery, the ACL-reconstructed leg showed lower KS compared to the uninvolved leg (P < 0.05), and knee joint moment output during landing was significantly correlated to KS.

Conclusions: The results highlight the important role of KS on the interaction between trunk angle, joint kinetics, and postural dynamic stability during landing and show that ACL-reconstructed patients use an analogous feedforward strategy (e.g., more flexed trunk) to that used in their ACL-deficient state, aiming to compensate for KS deficits and thereby sacrificing postural dynamic stability and increasing the risk of loss of balance during landing maneuvers.

Citing Articles

Single-Leg Hop Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Ready for Landing but Cleared for Take-Off?.

Rush J, Murray A, Sherman D, Gokeler A, Norte G J Athl Train. 2024; 59(11):1100-1109.

PMID: 38779887 PMC: 11611365. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0628.23.


Knee Biomechanics During Cutting Maneuvers and Secondary ACL Injury Risk: A Prospective Cohort Study of Knee Biomechanics in 756 Female Elite Handball and Soccer Players.

Mausehund L, Krosshaug T Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(5):1209-1219.

PMID: 38459717 PMC: 10986153. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241234255.


Bilateral movement asymmetries exist in recreational athletes during a 45° sidestep cut post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kaiyala M, Hannigan J, Traut A, Pollard C PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16948.

PMID: 38436020 PMC: 10908263. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16948.


Which Tests Predict 6-Month Isokinetic Quadriceps Strength After ACL Reconstruction? An Examination of Isometric Quadriceps Strength and Functional Tests at 3 Months.

Giampetruzzi N, Weaver A, Roman D, Cleland J, Ness B Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023; 18(6):1261-1270.

PMID: 38050543 PMC: 10693486. DOI: 10.26603/001c.89263.


Centroid position estimating method for observational analysis.

Fukui T, Ueda Y, Chiyomaru M, Ohkawa T, Fuse Y J Phys Ther Sci. 2023; 35(9):638-644.

PMID: 37670758 PMC: 10475649. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.35.638.