» Articles » PMID: 23028654

Dyslexia Impairs Speech Recognition but Can Spare Phonological Competence

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Oct 3
PMID 23028654
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dyslexia is associated with numerous deficits to speech processing. Accordingly, a large literature asserts that dyslexics manifest a phonological deficit. Few studies, however, have assessed the phonological grammar of dyslexics, and none has distinguished a phonological deficit from a phonetic impairment. Here, we show that these two sources can be dissociated. Three experiments demonstrate that a group of adult dyslexics studied here is impaired in phonetic discrimination (e.g., ba vs. pa), and their deficit compromises even the basic ability to identify acoustic stimuli as human speech. Remarkably, the ability of these individuals to generalize grammatical phonological rules is intact. Like typical readers, these Hebrew-speaking dyslexics identified ill-formed AAB stems (e.g., titug) as less wordlike than well-formed ABB controls (e.g., gitut), and both groups automatically extended this rule to nonspeech stimuli, irrespective of reading ability. The contrast between the phonetic and phonological capacities of these individuals demonstrates that the algebraic engine that generates phonological patterns is distinct from the phonetic interface that implements them. While dyslexia compromises the phonetic system, certain core aspects of the phonological grammar can be spared.

Citing Articles

Animal models of developmental dyslexia.

Galaburda A Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:981801.

PMID: 36452335 PMC: 9702821. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.981801.


Success Is Not the Entire Story for a Scientific Theory: The Case of the Phonological Deficit Theory of Dyslexia.

Zoccolotti P Brain Sci. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35447957 PMC: 9027514. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040425.


Public misconceptions about dyslexia: The role of intuitive psychology.

Berent I, Platt M PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0259019.

PMID: 34855765 PMC: 8638985. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259019.


Sonority as a Phonological Cue in Early Perception of Written Syllables in French.

Tossonian M, Ferrand L, Lucas O, Berthon M, Maionchi-Pino N Front Psychol. 2020; 11:558443.

PMID: 33178067 PMC: 7593649. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558443.


Universal Restrictions in Reading: What Do French Beginning Readers (Mis)perceive?.

Maionchi-Pino N, Carmona A, Tossonian M, Lucas O, Loiseau V, Ferrand L Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2914.

PMID: 32010015 PMC: 6974805. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02914.


References
1.
BERENT I, Everett D, Shimron J . Do phonological representations specify variables? Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cogn Psychol. 2001; 42(1):1-60. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0742. View

2.
Leppanen P, Richardson U, Pihko E, Eklund K, Guttorm T, Aro M . Brain responses to changes in speech sound durations differ between infants with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Dev Neuropsychol. 2002; 22(1):407-22. DOI: 10.1207/S15326942dn2201_4. View

3.
Zeguers M, Snellings P, Tijms J, Weeda W, Tamboer P, Bexkens A . Specifying theories of developmental dyslexia: a diffusion model analysis of word recognition. Dev Sci. 2011; 14(6):1340-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01091.x. View

4.
Theodore R, Miller J, DeSteno D . Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(6):3974-82. PMC: 2806434. DOI: 10.1121/1.3106131. View

5.
Corina D, Richards T, Serafini S, Richards A, Steury K, Abbott R . fMRI auditory language differences between dyslexic and able reading children. Neuroreport. 2001; 12(6):1195-201. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200105080-00029. View