» Articles » PMID: 23023591

Reoperation Rate After Surgery for Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc Disease: Nationwide Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Oct 2
PMID 23023591
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study using national health insurance data.

Objective: To provide a longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (HIVD) disease, and to compare the reoperation rates of surgical methods.

Summary Of Background Data: Herniated intervertebral disc disease is the most common cause of lumbar spinal surgery. Despite improved surgical techniques and instrumentation, reoperation cannot be avoided. The reoperation rates were in the range of 6% to 24% in previous studies. A population-based study is less subject to bias; hence, a nationwide longitudinal analysis was warranted.

Methods: A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent first surgery for herniated intervertebral disc disease in 2003 and 18,590 patients were selected. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years through their encrypted unique resident registration number. The primary endpoint was any type of second lumbar surgery. After adjusting for confounding factors, 5 surgical methods (fusion, laminectomy, open discectomy, endoscopic discectomy, and nucleolysis [including mechanical nucleus decompression]) were compared. Open discectomy was used as the reference method.

Results: Open discectomy was the most common procedure (68.9%) followed by endoscopic discectomy (16.1%), laminectomy (7.9%), fusion (3.9%), and nucleolysis (3.2%). The cumulative reoperation rate was 5.4% at 3 months, 7.4% at 1 year, 9% at 2 years, 10.5% at 3 years, 12.1% at 4 years, and 13.4% at 5 years. The reoperation rates were 18.6%, 14.7%, 13.8%, 12.4%, and 11.8% after laminectomy, nucleolysis, open discectomy, endoscopic discectomy, and fusion, respectively. Compared with open discectomy, the reoperation rate was higher after laminectomy at 3 months, whereas the other surgical methods had similar rates.

Conclusion: The cumulative reoperation rate after 5 years was 13.4% and half of the reoperations occurred during the first postoperative year. With the exception of laminectomy, the reoperation rates of the other procedures were not different from that of open discectomy.

Citing Articles

The importance of the posterior osteoligamentous complex of the lumbar spine: dogma changing biomechanical insights.

Jokeit M, Cornaz F, Schader J, Harshbarger C, Calek A, Jecklin S Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39912946 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08690-7.


Comparison of postoperative complications and outcomes following primary versus revision discectomy: A national database analysis.

Hoang R, Song J, Tiao J, Trent S, Ngan A, Hoang T J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024; 15(3):303-307.

PMID: 39483833 PMC: 11524557. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_97_24.


Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database.

Yuh W, Kim J, Kim M, Kim J, Kim Y, Kim S PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305128.

PMID: 38861502 PMC: 11166321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305128.


Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope do not differ in two types of postoperative lumbar disc re-herniation: a cross-sectional observational study.

Shen Z, Wang W, Ni L, Zhao H, Yang L, Yang H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):267.

PMID: 38582848 PMC: 10998392. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07376-3.


Management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a comparative analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and repeat discectomy.

Musa G, Makirov S, Chmutin G, Susin S, Kim A, Antonov G Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(2):842-849.

PMID: 38333282 PMC: 10849456. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001600.