» Articles » PMID: 23015264

Feasibility, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of Hepatic Administration of Drug-eluting Beads Loaded with Irinotecan (DEBIRI) Followed by Intravenous Administration of Irinotecan in a Porcine Model

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Sep 28
PMID 23015264
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Irinotecan eluting embolization beads (DEBIRI) are currently being evaluated in the clinic for the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics associated with two cycles of hepatic embolization using DEBIRI followed by intravenous administration of irinotecan. Pigs were embolized with DEBIRI (100-300 μm, 100 mg dose, n = 6) and blood samples taken over 24 h to determine plasma levels of irinotecan and SN-38 metabolite and for haematology and biochemistry. At 24 h an IV infusion of 250 mg/m(2) of irinotecan was administered and the plasma levels taken again. This cycle was repeated 3 weeks later. A single animal was subjected to a more aggressive regimen of embolization with 200 mg bead dose and IV of 350 mg/m(2) for two cycles. Three animals were sacrificed at 6 weeks and the remaining four (n = 3 standard dose, n = 1 high dose) animals at 12 weeks and detailed histopathology performed. All animals tolerated the treatments well, with only minor changes in haematological and biochemical parameters. There was no overlap in drug plasma levels observed from the bead and IV treatments when given 24 h apart and no difference between the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two cycles separated by 3 weeks. Irinotecan plasma AUC values were similar in both the embolization and IV arms of the study. C(max) values obtained during the IV arms of the study are approximately double that of the embolization arms whilst T(max) times are shorter in the IV arms, supporting extended release of drug from the beads. Bioavailability for bead-based delivery was double that for IV administration, which was attributed to reduced clearance of the drug when delivered by this route. No additive toxicity was observed as a consequence of the combined treatments. The combination of irinotecan delivery via drug eluting bead and IV was well-tolerated with no significant clinical effects. Pharmacokinetic analyses suggest the bioavailability from bead-based delivery of drug is double that of IV infusion, attributable to reduced drug clearance for the former.

Citing Articles

A Comparative Study of DC Beads, Callispheres and Multimodal Imaging Nano-Assembled Microspheres Loaded with Irinotecan in Vitro.

Wang J, Zhang S, He Y, Sun W, Zhu X, Xi Z Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241274289.

PMID: 39149935 PMC: 11456700. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241274289.


Evaluation of immune-modulating drugs for use in drug-eluting microsphere transarterial embolization.

Mikhail A, Mauda-Havakuk M, Negussie A, Hong N, Hawken N, Carlson C Int J Pharm. 2022; 616:121466.

PMID: 35065205 PMC: 9139086. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121466.


Safety and Tolerability of Topotecan-Eluting Radiopaque Microspheres for Hepatic Chemoembolization in a Rabbit Preclinical Model.

Mikhail A, Levy E, Krishnasamy V, Woods D, Esparza-Trujillo J, Bakhutashvili I Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020; 43(12):1918-1924.

PMID: 32803282 PMC: 7655617. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02609-z.


Updates of colorectal cancer liver metastases therapy: review on DEBIRI.

Fiorentini G, Sarti D, Nani R, Aliberti C, Fiorentini C, Guadagni S Hepat Oncol. 2020; 7(1):HEP16.

PMID: 32273974 PMC: 7137176. DOI: 10.2217/hep-2019-0010.


Predictive performance of the mHAP-II score in a real-life western cohort with hepatocellular carcinoma following trans-arterial chemoembolisation with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE).

Peisen F, Maurer M, Grosse U, Nikolaou K, Syha R, Ketelsen D Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(7):3782-3792.

PMID: 32125515 PMC: 7305077. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06734-8.


References
1.
Eyol E, Boleij A, Taylor R, Lewis A, Berger M . Chemoembolisation of rat colorectal liver metastases with drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan or doxorubicin. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008; 25(3):273-82. DOI: 10.1007/s10585-008-9142-x. View

2.
Forster R, Small S, Tang Y, Heaysman C, Lloyd A, Macfarlane W . Comparison of DC Bead-irinotecan and DC Bead-topotecan drug eluting beads for use in locoregional drug delivery to treat pancreatic cancer. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010; 21(9):2683-90. PMC: 2935541. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4107-4. View

3.
Martin R, Howard J, Tomalty D, Robbins K, Padr R, Bosnjakovic P . Toxicity of irinotecan-eluting beads in the treatment of hepatic malignancies: results of a multi-institutional registry. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33(5):960-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9937-4. View

4.
Rao P, Pascale F, Seck A, Auperin A, Drouard-Troalen L, Deschamps F . Irinotecan loaded in eluting beads: preclinical assessment in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35(6):1448-59. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0343-y. View

5.
De Baere T, Deschamps F, Teriitheau C, Rao P, Conengrapht K, Schlumberger M . Transarterial chemoembolization of liver metastases from well differentiated gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors with doxorubicin-eluting beads: preliminary results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 19(6):855-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.01.030. View