» Articles » PMID: 23013200

Advanced Meter Features Improve Postprandial and Paired Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Individuals with Diabetes: Results of the Actions with the CONTOUR Blood Glucose Meter and Behaviors in Frequent Testers (ACT) Study

Overview
Date 2012 Sep 28
PMID 23013200
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study evaluated whether education and use of the advanced meter features of the CONTOUR(®) (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diabetes Care, Tarrytown, NY) blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) affect the frequency and pattern of blood glucose testing in insulin-using subjects with diabetes who routinely perform self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).

Subjects And Methods: Insulin-using subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this 6-month, multicenter, prospective study and randomized to one of two groups. The basic meter features group (BMF group) received basic instruction in the use of the BGMS, whereas the advanced meter features group (AMF group) also received training in the use of advanced features, including the meal marker and audible reminder, and were instructed to use these features. Both groups received education on the importance of postprandial testing.

Results: The AMF group (n=105) had significantly greater average weekly postprandial blood glucose testing than the BMF group (n=106) at each follow-up visit (P<0.001) and significantly increased the frequency of paired blood glucose testing (P<0.001) as well. In both groups, glycated hemoglobin decreased significantly as postprandial testing frequency increased (P<0.05). Subject reports indicated that use of advanced features made postmeal SMBG considerably easier to remember, helped them better understand how to make decisions on their own, and increased their confidence in meal choices.

Conclusions: Study findings showed that advanced features of the CONTOUR BGMS increased structured testing as measured by postprandial and paired SMBG and were perceived as useful by patients.

Citing Articles

Use of Blood Glucose Meters Featuring Color Range Indicators Improves Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes in Comparison to Blood Glucose Meters Without Color (ACCENTS Study).

Grady M, Katz L, Levy B J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018; 12(6):1211-1219.

PMID: 29848106 PMC: 6232745. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818775755.


Use of a Combined Blood-Glucose- and ß-Ketone-Measuring Device Improves Glycemic Control in Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes: The Gold Plus Study.

Ziegler R, Eichholz R, Schulz B J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 9(6):1270-4.

PMID: 25986628 PMC: 4667309. DOI: 10.1177/1932296815587936.


Improving Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose among Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the Mobile™ Study.

Overland J, Abousleiman J, Chronopoulos A, Leader N, Molyneaux L, Gilfillan C Diabetes Ther. 2014; 5(2):557-65.

PMID: 25502007 PMC: 4269644. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-014-0092-9.


Penny wise and pound foolish: will shortsighted cost reduction measures compromise patient access to promising self-monitoring of blood glucose technology?.

Parkin C J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7(4):979-82.

PMID: 23911179 PMC: 3879762. DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700420.


Evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system with automatic high- and low-pattern recognition software in insulin-using patients: pattern detection and patient-reported insights.

Grady M, Campbell D, Macleod K, Srinivasan A J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7(4):970-8.

PMID: 23911178 PMC: 3879761. DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700419.