» Articles » PMID: 23007035

Comparing Electric Shock and a Fearful Screaming Face As Unconditioned Stimuli for Fear Learning

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2012 Sep 26
PMID 23007035
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The potency of an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) can impact the degree of fear learning. One of the most common and effective UCSs is an electric shock, which is inappropriate for certain populations (e.g., children). To address this need, a novel fear learning paradigm was recently developed that uses a fearful female face and scream as the UCS. The present study directly compared the efficacy of the screaming female UCS and a traditional shock UCS in two fear learning paradigms. Thirty-six young adults completed two fear learning tasks and a measure of trait anxiety; fear learning was indexed with fear-potentiated startle (FPS) and self-reported fear ratings. Results indicated comparable FPS across the two tasks. However, larger overall startle responses were exhibited in the shock task, and participants rated the shock UCS and overall task as more aversive than the screaming female. In addition, trait anxiety was only related to FPS in the fear learning task that employed a shock as the UCS. Taken together, results indicate that, although both UCS paradigms can be used for fear conditioning (i.e., to produce differences between CS+ and CS-), the shock UCS paradigm is more aversive and potentially more sensitive to individual differences in anxiety.

Citing Articles

The unique face of comorbid anxiety and depression: Increased frontal, insula and cingulate cortex response during Pavlovian fear-conditioning.

Poplin T, Ironside M, Kuplicki R, Aupperle R, Guinjoan S, Khalsa S J Affect Disord. 2024; 366:98-105.

PMID: 39187192 PMC: 11481760. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.143.


The unique face of anxious depression: Increased sustained threat circuitry response during fear acquisition.

Poplin T, Ironside M, Kuplicki R, Aupperle R, Guinjoan S, Khalsa S bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905149 PMC: 10614928. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.17.562565.


Extinction Learning Across Development: Neurodevelopmental Changes and Implications for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders.

Kitt E, Odriozola P, Gee D Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023; 64:237-256.

PMID: 37532964 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2023_430.


Fear conditioning depends on the nature of the unconditional stimulus and may be related to hair levels of endocannabinoids.

Ney L, Nichols D, Lipp O Psychophysiology. 2023; 60(8):e14297.

PMID: 36959707 PMC: 10909444. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14297.


Dynamic Tracking of State Anxiety Multi-Modal Data and Machine Learning.

Ding Y, Liu J, Zhang X, Yang Z Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:757961.

PMID: 35308879 PMC: 8924121. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.757961.


References
1.
Lang P, Bradley M, Cuthbert B . Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychol Rev. 1990; 97(3):377-95. View

2.
Reeb-Sutherland B, Helfinstein S, Degnan K, Perez-Edgar K, Henderson H, Lissek S . Startle response in behaviorally inhibited adolescents with a lifetime occurrence of anxiety disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 48(6):610-617. PMC: 2786057. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819f70fb. View

3.
Grillon C, Lissek S, Rabin S, McDowell D, Dvir S, Pine D . Increased anxiety during anticipation of unpredictable but not predictable aversive stimuli as a psychophysiologic marker of panic disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165(7):898-904. PMC: 2669688. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101581. View

4.
Hamm A, Greenwald M, Bradley M, Lang P . Emotional learning, hedonic change, and the startle probe. J Abnorm Psychol. 1993; 102(3):453-65. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.102.3.453. View

5.
Tottenham N, Tanaka J, Leon A, McCarry T, Nurse M, Hare T . The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res. 2009; 168(3):242-9. PMC: 3474329. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006. View