» Articles » PMID: 23002360

Clinical Usefulness of Adherence to Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease Guideline by Spanish Gastroenterologists

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2012 Sep 25
PMID 23002360
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To investigate usefulness of adherence to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) guideline established by the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology.

Methods: Prospective, observational and multicentre study of 301 patients with typical symptoms of GERD who should be managed in accordance with guidelines and were attended by gastroenterologists in daily practice. Patients (aged > 18 years) were eligible for inclusion if they had typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) as the major complaint in the presence or absence of accompanying atypical symptoms, such as dyspeptic symptoms and/or supraesophageal symptoms. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions should be made based on specific recommendations of the Spanish clinical practice guideline for GERD which is a widely disseminated and well known instrument among Spanish in digestive disease specialists.

Results: Endoscopy was indicated in 123 (41%) patients: 50 with alarm symptoms, 32 with age > 50 years without alarm symptom. Seventy-two patients (58.5%) had esophagitis (grade A, 23, grade B, 28, grade C, 18, grade D, 3). In the presence of alarm symptoms, endoscopy was indicated consistently with recommendations in 98% of cases. However, in the absence of alarm symptoms, endoscopy was indicated in 33% of patients > 50 years (not recommended by the guideline). Adherence for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy was 80%, but doses prescribed were lower (half) in 5% of cases and higher (double) in 15%. Adherence regarding duration of PPI therapy was 69%; duration was shorter than recommended in 1% (4 wk in esophagitis grades C-D) or longer in 30% (8 wk in esophagitis grades A-B or in patients without endoscopy). Treatment response was higher when PPI doses were consistent with guidelines, although differences were not significant (95% vs 85%).

Conclusion: GERD guideline compliance was quite good although endoscopy was over indicated in patients > 50 years without alarm symptoms; PPIs were prescribed at higher doses and longer duration.

Citing Articles

Patient journey in gastroesophageal reflux disease: real-world perspectives from Italian gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, and ENT specialists.

Pasta A, Pelizzaro F, Marabotto E, Calabrese F, Formisano E, Djahandideh Sheijani S Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241239590.

PMID: 38524789 PMC: 10960349. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241239590.

References
1.
Moayyedi P, Talley N . Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 2006; 367(9528):2086-100. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68932-0. View

2.
Ray W, Stein C, Byrd V, Shorr R, Pichert J, Gideon P . Educational program for physicians to reduce use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among community-dwelling elderly persons: a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 2001; 39(5):425-35. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00003. View

3.
Armstrong D, Marshall J, Chiba N, Enns R, Fallone C, Fass R . Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults - update 2004. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005; 19(1):15-35. DOI: 10.1155/2005/836030. View

4.
Nocon M, Labenz J, Jaspersen D, Leodolter A, Richter K, Vieth M . Health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease under routine care: 5-year follow-up results of the ProGERD study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 29(6):662-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03921.x. View

5.
Cardin F, Zorzi M, Furlanetto A, Guerra C, Bandini F, Polito D . Are dyspepsia management guidelines coherent with primary care practice?. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002; 37(11):1269-75. DOI: 10.1080/003655202761020533. View