Measurement of Elasticity and Transepidermal Water Loss Rate of Burn Scars with the Dermalab(®)
Authors
Affiliations
This cross-sectional study investigated the reproducibility of repeated elasticity and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements with the DermaLab(®) on 32 active burn scars and healthy skin. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was examined by means of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM). Results showed good ICC values and rather high SEM values for inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of elasticity measurements. For TEWL measurements, ICC values were good and SEM values were high for inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. There was a significant difference between the estimated mean elasticity values of normal skin and grafted scars and between normal skin and spontaneously healed scars (p≤0.003). For the estimated mean TEWL values, there was a significant difference between normal skin and spontaneously healed scars (p=0.036). A significant negative relation was reported between mean TEWL and time after burn (p=0.008). In clinical trials it is necessary to interpret patient-specific changes in elasticity and TEWL with caution, since the SEMs of both modes are rather high. We therefore recommend the use of a mean of repeated measurements of elasticity and TEWL to decrease the SEM.
Chuang A, Lin E, Wu B, Lu M, Chiang H, Chu P Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; .
PMID: 39407005 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04407-1.
Staubach R, Glosse H, Loff S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).
PMID: 38673661 PMC: 11051571. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082389.
Heitzmann W, Schulz A, Fuchs P, Schiefer J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(3).
PMID: 38541207 PMC: 10972138. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60030481.
An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body locations.
John A, Del Galdo F, Gush R, Worsley P Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(2):e13292.
PMID: 36823505 PMC: 10155800. DOI: 10.1111/srt.13292.
Comparison of biopolymer scaffolds for the fabrication of skin substitutes in a porcine wound model.
Dearman B, Boyce S, Greenwood J Wound Repair Regen. 2022; 31(1):87-98.
PMID: 36459148 PMC: 10107251. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13059.