» Articles » PMID: 22996144

Continuous Glucose Monitoring After Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes: an Excellent Graft Function (β-score Greater Than 7) Is Required to Abrogate Hyperglycemia, Whereas a Minimal Function is Necessary to Suppress Severe Hypoglycemia...

Abstract

Context: For the last 10 yr, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has brought up new insights into the accuracy of blood glucose analysis.

Objective: Our objective was to determine how islet graft function was able to influence the various components of dysglycemia after islet transplantation (IT).

Design And Setting: We conducted a single-arm open-labeled study with a 3-yr follow-up in a referral center (ClinicalTrial.gov identifiers NCT00446264 and NCT01123187).

Patients: Twenty-three consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes (14 islet alone, nine islet after kidney) received IT within 3 months using the Edmonton protocol.

Intervention: INTERVENTION included 72-h CGM before and 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 36 months after transplantation.

Main Outcome Measure: Graft function was estimated via β-score, a previously validated index (range 0-8) based on treatment requirements, C-peptide, blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin.

Results: At the 3-yr visit, graft function persisted in 19 patients (82%), and 10 (43%) remained insulin independent. Glycated hemoglobin decreased in the whole cohort from 8.3% (7.3-9.0%) at baseline to 6.7% (5.9-7.7%) at 3 yr [median (interquartile range), P < 0.01]. Mean glucose, glucose sd, and time spent with glycemia above 10 mmol/liter (hyperglycemia) and below 3 mmol/liter (hypoglycemia) were significantly lower after IT (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). The four CGM outcomes were related to β-score (P < 0.001). However, partial function (β-score >3) was sufficient to abrogate hypoglycemia; suboptimal function (β-score >5) was necessary to significantly improve mean glucose, glucose sd, and hyperglycemia; and optimal function (β score >7) was necessary to normalize them.

Conclusion: The four components of dysglycemia were not equally affected by the degree of islet graft function, which could have important implications for future development of β-cell replacement. A β-score above 3 dramatically reduced the occurrence of hypoglycemia.

Citing Articles

Anti-Inflammatory Effects of -Generated Donor Antigen-Specific Immunomodulatory Cells on Pancreatic Islet Transplantation.

Forgioni A, Watanabe M, Goto R, Harada T, Ota T, Shimamura T Cell Transplant. 2025; 34:9636897251317887.

PMID: 39981681 PMC: 11843686. DOI: 10.1177/09636897251317887.


A cross-sectional questionnaire study: Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia remains prevalent in adults with type 1 diabetes and is associated with the risk of severe hypoglycaemia.

Baxter F, Baillie N, Dover A, Stimson R, Gibb F, Forbes S PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0297601.

PMID: 38875308 PMC: 11178233. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297601.


Primary Graft Function and 5 Year Insulin Independence After Pancreas and Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Parallel Cohort Study.

Chetboun M, Masset C, Maanaoui M, Defrance F, Gmyr V, Raverdy V Transpl Int. 2024; 36:11950.

PMID: 38213551 PMC: 10783428. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11950.


Allo Beta Cell transplantation: specific features, unanswered questions, and immunological challenge.

Caldara R, Tomajer V, Monti P, Sordi V, Citro A, Chimienti R Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1323439.

PMID: 38077372 PMC: 10701551. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1323439.


Islets-on-Chip: A Tool for Real-Time Assessment of Islet Function Prior to Transplantation.

Raoux M, Lablanche S, Jaffredo M, Pirog A, Benhamou P, Lebreton F Transpl Int. 2023; 36:11512.

PMID: 37885808 PMC: 10598278. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11512.


References
1.
Derosa G, Salvadeo S, Mereu R, DAngelo A, Ciccarelli L, Piccinni M . Continuous glucose monitoring system in free-living healthy subjects: results from a pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11(3):159-69. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0101. View

2.
Zhou J, Li H, Ran X, Yang W, Li Q, Peng Y . Reference values for continuous glucose monitoring in Chinese subjects. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(7):1188-93. PMC: 2699703. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0076. View

3.
Hirsch D, Odorico J, Danobeitia J, Alejandro R, Rickels M, Hanson M . Early metabolic markers that anticipate loss of insulin independence in type 1 diabetic islet allograft recipients. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12(5):1275-89. PMC: 4569145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03947.x. View

4.
Kessler L, Passemard R, Oberholzer J, Benhamou P, Bucher P, Toso C . Reduction of blood glucose variability in type 1 diabetic patients treated by pancreatic islet transplantation: interest of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(12):2256-62. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2256. View

5.
Paty B, Senior P, Lakey J, Shapiro A, Ryan E . Assessment of glycemic control after islet transplantation using the continuous glucose monitor in insulin-independent versus insulin-requiring type 1 diabetes subjects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006; 8(2):165-73. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2006.8.165. View