» Articles » PMID: 22987736

Prediction of Protein Domain Boundaries from Inverse Covariances

Overview
Journal Proteins
Date 2012 Sep 19
PMID 22987736
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been known even since relatively few structures had been solved that longer protein chains often contain multiple domains, which may fold separately and play the role of reusable functional modules found in many contexts. In many structural biology tasks, in particular structure prediction, it is of great use to be able to identify domains within the structure and analyze these regions separately. However, when using sequence data alone this task has proven exceptionally difficult, with relatively little improvement over the naive method of choosing boundaries based on size distributions of observed domains. The recent significant improvement in contact prediction provides a new source of information for domain prediction. We test several methods for using this information including a kernel smoothing-based approach and methods based on building alpha-carbon models and compare performance with a length-based predictor, a homology search method and four published sequence-based predictors: DOMCUT, DomPRO, DLP-SVM, and SCOOBY-DOmain. We show that the kernel-smoothing method is significantly better than the other ab initio predictors when both single-domain and multidomain targets are considered and is not significantly different to the homology-based method. Considering only multidomain targets the kernel-smoothing method outperforms all of the published methods except DLP-SVM. The kernel smoothing method therefore represents a potentially useful improvement to ab initio domain prediction.

Citing Articles

ConPlot: web-based application for the visualization of protein contact maps integrated with other data.

Sanchez Rodriguez F, Mesdaghi S, Simpkin A, Burgos-Marmol J, Murphy D, Uski V Bioinformatics. 2021; 37(17):2763-2765.

PMID: 34499718 PMC: 8428603. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab049.


In silico prediction of structure and function for a large family of transmembrane proteins that includes human Tmem41b.

Mesdaghi S, Murphy D, Sanchez Rodriguez F, Burgos-Marmol J, Rigden D F1000Res. 2021; 9:1395.

PMID: 33520197 PMC: 7818093. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27676.2.


Co-evolution techniques are reshaping the way we do structural bioinformatics.

De Oliveira S, Deane C F1000Res. 2017; 6:1224.

PMID: 28781768 PMC: 5531156. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11543.1.


Applications of contact predictions to structural biology.

Simkovic F, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D, Rigden D IUCrJ. 2017; 4(Pt 3):291-300.

PMID: 28512576 PMC: 5414403. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252517005115.


Residue contacts predicted by evolutionary covariance extend the application of ab initio molecular replacement to larger and more challenging protein folds.

Simkovic F, Thomas J, Keegan R, Winn M, Mayans O, Rigden D IUCrJ. 2016; 3(Pt 4):259-70.

PMID: 27437113 PMC: 4937781. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252516008113.


References
1.
Holland T, Veretnik S, Shindyalov I, Bourne P . Partitioning protein structures into domains: why is it so difficult?. J Mol Biol. 2006; 361(3):562-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.05.060. View

2.
Vassura M, Margara L, Di Lena P, Medri F, Fariselli P, Casadio R . Reconstruction of 3D structures from protein contact maps. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2008; 5(3):357-67. DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.27. View

3.
Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics. 2007; 9(3):432-41. PMC: 3019769. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045. View

4.
Eddy S . A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform. 2010; 23(1):205-11. View

5.
Hadley C, Jones D . A systematic comparison of protein structure classifications: SCOP, CATH and FSSP. Structure. 1999; 7(9):1099-112. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80177-4. View