» Articles » PMID: 22984488

Active Collisions in Altered Gravity Reveal Eye-hand Coordination Strategies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Sep 18
PMID 22984488
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most object manipulation tasks involve a series of actions demarcated by mechanical contact events, and gaze is usually directed to the locations of these events as the task unfolds. Typically, gaze foveates the target 200 ms in advance of the contact. This strategy improves manual accuracy through visual feedback and the use of gaze-related signals to guide the hand/object. Many studies have investigated eye-hand coordination in experimental and natural tasks; most of them highlighted a strong link between eye movements and hand or object kinematics. In this experiment, we analyzed gaze strategies in a collision task but in a very challenging dynamical context. Participants performed collisions while they were exposed to alternating episodes of microgravity, hypergravity and normal gravity. First, by isolating the effects of inertia in microgravity, we found that peak hand acceleration marked the transition between two modes of grip force control. Participants exerted grip forces that paralleled load force profiles, and then increased grip up to a maximum shifted after the collision. Second, we found that the oculomotor strategy adapted visual feedback of the controlled object around the collision, as demonstrated by longer durations of fixation after collision in new gravitational environments. Finally, despite large variability of arm dynamics in altered gravity, we found that saccades were remarkably time-locked to the peak hand acceleration in all conditions. In conclusion, altered gravity allowed light to be shed on predictive mechanisms used by the central nervous system to coordinate gaze, hand and grip motor actions during a mixed task that involved transport of an object and high impact loads.

Citing Articles

Mental imagery of object motion in weightlessness.

Gravano S, Lacquaniti F, Zago M NPJ Microgravity. 2021; 7(1):50.

PMID: 34862387 PMC: 8642442. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-021-00179-z.


The effects of varying gravito-inertial stressors on grip strength and hemodynamic responses in men and women.

White O, Barbiero M, Goswami N Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 119(4):951-960.

PMID: 30730002 PMC: 6422992. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04084-y.


Switching in Feedforward Control of Grip Force During Tool-Mediated Interaction With Elastic Force Fields.

White O, Karniel A, Papaxanthis C, Barbiero M, Nisky I Front Neurorobot. 2018; 12:31.

PMID: 29930504 PMC: 5999723. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00031.


Sensorimotor Reorganizations of Arm Kinematics and Postural Strategy for Functional Whole-Body Reaching Movements in Microgravity.

Macaluso T, Bourdin C, Buloup F, Mille M, Sainton P, Sarlegna F Front Physiol. 2017; 8:821.

PMID: 29104544 PMC: 5654841. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00821.


Eye-Head Coordination in 31 Space Shuttle Astronauts during Visual Target Acquisition.

Reschke M, Kolev O, Clement G Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14283.

PMID: 29079792 PMC: 5660216. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14752-8.


References
1.
Land M . Predictable eye-head coordination during driving. Nature. 1992; 359(6393):318-20. DOI: 10.1038/359318a0. View

2.
Ronsse R, White O, Lefevre P . Computation of gaze orientation under unrestrained head movements. J Neurosci Methods. 2006; 159(1):158-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.06.016. View

3.
Gentili R, Cahouet V, Papaxanthis C . Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field. Neuroscience. 2007; 145(1):20-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.035. View

4.
Bootsma R, Oudejans R . Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(5):1041-52. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.5.1041. View

5.
Saunders J, Knill D . Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 152(3):341-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1525-2. View