» Articles » PMID: 22984167

Informing Parents About Positive Newborn Screen Results: Parents' Recommendations

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2012 Sep 18
PMID 22984167
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This descriptive study examined parents' reactions to newborn screening (NBS) results and their recommendations for improving communication. Dimensional and content analyses were conducted on interviews with 203 parents of 106 infants having positive NBS results. Diagnostic results confirmed infants as having congenital hypothyroidism (n = 37), cystic fibrosis (n = 26), or being cystic fibrosis (CF)-carriers (n = 43). Parents' reactions ranged from 'very scary' to 'not too concerned'. Most reported feeling shock, panic, and worry; some reported guilt. Parents in the CF and CF-carrier groups preferred face-to-face disclosure as the communication channel; whereas congenital hypothyroidism group parents supported telephone contacts. Parents recommended providers be well informed, honest, and calm; personalize disclosure, avoid jargon, listen carefully, encourage questions, recognize parental distress, offer realistic reassurance, pace amount and rate of information, assess parents' understanding, and refer to specialists. We conclude that provider-patient communication approach and channel can exacerbate or alleviate parents' negative reactions to positive NBS results.

Citing Articles

Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.

Rivero-Arias O, Png M, White A, Yang M, Taylor-Phillips S, Hinton L Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(25):1-180.

PMID: 38938110 PMC: 11228689. DOI: 10.3310/PYTK6591.


Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review.

Chudleigh J, Holder P Children (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790502 PMC: 11120117. DOI: 10.3390/children11050507.


Understanding the psychological impact of identifying carrier status on young adults: A qualitative study exploring peer reactions.

Bowen E, Langston J, Fletcher H, Domek J, Ulph F J Genet Couns. 2024; 34(1):e1903.

PMID: 38666560 PMC: 11735185. DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1903.


Parental Experiences with Newborn Screening and Gene Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Meyer A, Connolly A, Vannatta K, Hacker N, Hatfield A, Decipeda A J Neuromuscul Dis. 2023; 11(1):129-142.

PMID: 38160362 PMC: 10789343. DOI: 10.3233/JND-230082.


Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures.

Odenwald B, Brockow I, Hanauer M, Luders A, Nennstiel U Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 37489488 PMC: 10366861. DOI: 10.3390/ijns9030035.


References
1.
Moran J, Quirk K, Duff A, Brownlee K . Newborn screening for CF in a regional paediatric centre: the psychosocial effects of false-positive IRT results on parents. J Cyst Fibros. 2006; 6(3):250-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2006.09.001. View

2.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

3.
Beucher J, Leray E, Deneuville E, Roblin M, Pin I, Bremont F . Psychological effects of false-positive results in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a two-year follow-up. J Pediatr. 2010; 156(5):771-6, 776.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.12.003. View

4.
Midson R, Carter B . Addressing end of life care issues in a tertiary treatment centre: lessons learned from surveying parents' experiences. J Child Health Care. 2010; 14(1):52-66. DOI: 10.1177/1367493509347060. View

5.
Rastogi M, LaFranchi S . Congenital hypothyroidism. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010; 5:17. PMC: 2903524. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-17. View