Contribution of Water-soluble and Insoluble Components and Their Hydrophobic/hydrophilic Subfractions to the Reactive Oxygen Species-generating Potential of Fine Ambient Aerosols
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Relative contributions of water- and methanol-soluble compounds and their hydrophobic/hydrophilic subfractions to the ROS (reactive oxygen species)-generating potential of ambient fine aerosols (D(p) < 2.5 μm) are assessed. ROS-generating (or oxidative) potential of the particulate matter (PM) was measured by the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay. Particles were collected on quartz filters (N = 8) at an urban site near central Atlanta during January-February 2012 using a PM(2.5) high-volume sampler. Filter punches were extracted separately in both water and methanol. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic fractions were then subsequently segregated via a C-18 solid phase extraction column. The DTT assay response was significantly higher for the methanol extract, and for both extracts a substantial fraction of PM oxidative potential was associated with the hydrophobic compounds as evident from a substantial attenuation in DTT response after passing PM extracts through the C-18 column (64% for water and 83% for methanol extract; both median values). The DTT activities of water and methanol extracts were correlated with the water-soluble (R = 0.86) and water-insoluble organic carbon (R = 0.94) contents of the PM, respectively. Brown carbon (BrC), which predominantly represents the hydrophobic organic fraction (referred to as humic-like substances, HULIS), was also correlated with DTT activity in both the water (R = 0.78) and methanol extracts (R = 0.83). Oxidative potential was not correlated with any metals measured in the extracts. These findings suggest that the hydrophobic components of both water-soluble and insoluble organic aerosols substantially contribute to the oxidative properties of ambient PM. Further investigation of these hydrophobic organic compounds could help identify sources of a significant fraction of ambient aerosol toxicity.
Jovanovic M, Zivkovic M, Petrovic B, Iram S, Jovasevic-Stojanovic M, Stevanovic S Toxics. 2025; 13(2).
PMID: 39997928 PMC: 11860352. DOI: 10.3390/toxics13020113.
Sanchez L, Villacura L, Catalan F, Araya R, Guzman M Antioxidants (Basel). 2024; 13(6).
PMID: 38929079 PMC: 11200927. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13060640.
Kayalar O, Rajabi H, Konyalilar N, Mortazavi D, Aksoy G, Wang J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1324552.
PMID: 38524119 PMC: 10957538. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1324552.
Aghaei Y, Aldekheel M, Tohidi R, Badami M, Farahani V, Sioutas C Atmos Environ (1994). 2024; 319.
PMID: 38250566 PMC: 10795521. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120316.
Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal.
Du Y, Zhao F, Tao R, Liu B BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):652.
PMID: 37684672 PMC: 10492290. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03369-1.