» Articles » PMID: 22970148

Distinct and Contrasting Transcription Initiation Patterns at Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Promoters

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Sep 13
PMID 22970148
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome lead to better understanding of transcription units and gene functions, interactions occurring during transcription initiation between RNA polymerase and promoters is yet to be elucidated. Different stages of transcription initiation include promoter specific binding of RNAP, isomerization, abortive initiation and promoter clearance. We have now analyzed these events with four promoters of M. tuberculosis viz. P(gyrB1), P(gyrR), P(rrnPCL1) and P(metU). The promoters differed from each other in their rates of open complex formation, decay, promoter clearance and abortive transcription. The equilibrium binding and kinetic studies of various steps revealed distinct rate limiting events for each of the promoter, which also differed markedly in their characteristics from the respective promoters of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Surprisingly, the transcription at gyr promoter was enhanced in the presence of initiating nucleotides and decreased in the presence of alarmone, pppGpp, a pattern typically seen with rRNA promoters studied so far. The gyr promoter of M. smegmatis, on the other hand, was not subjected to pppGpp mediated regulation. The marked differences in the transcription initiation pathway seen with rrn and gyr promoters of M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis suggest that such species specific differences in the regulation of expression of the crucial housekeeping genes could be one of the key determinants contributing to the differences in growth rate and lifestyle of the two organisms. Moreover, the distinct rate limiting steps during transcription initiation of each one of the promoters studied point at variations in their intracellular regulation.

Citing Articles

Conditional down-regulation of GreA impacts expression of rRNA and transcription factors, affecting Mycobacterium smegmatis survival.

Jha R, Udupa S, Rai A, Rani P, Singh P, Govind S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):5802.

PMID: 32242064 PMC: 7118132. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62703-7.


Physiology and Transcriptional Analysis of (p)ppGpp-Related Regulatory Effects in .

Ruwe M, Persicke M, Busche T, Muller B, Kalinowski J Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:2769.

PMID: 31849906 PMC: 6892785. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02769.


CarD and RbpA modify the kinetics of initial transcription and slow promoter escape of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA polymerase.

Jensen D, Ruiz Manzano A, Rammohan J, Stallings C, Galburt E Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(13):6685-6698.

PMID: 31127308 PMC: 6648326. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz449.


The stringent response and Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis.

Prusa J, Zhu D, Stallings C Pathog Dis. 2018; 76(5).

PMID: 29947752 PMC: 7191866. DOI: 10.1093/femspd/fty054.


MicroRNA signatures from multidrug‑resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Ren N, Gao G, Sun Y, Zhang L, Wang H, Hua W Mol Med Rep. 2015; 12(5):6561-7.

PMID: 26324150 PMC: 4626138. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4262.


References
1.
Saecker R, Tsodikov O, McQuade K, Schlax Jr P, Capp M, Record Jr M . Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase with the lambdaP(R) promoter: large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates. J Mol Biol. 2002; 319(3):649-71. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00293-0. View

2.
Mukherjee R, Chatterji D . Stationary phase induced alterations in mycobacterial RNA polymerase assembly: A cue to its phenotypic resistance towards rifampicin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008; 369(3):899-904. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.118. View

3.
deHaseth P, Zupancic M, Record Jr M . RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: the comings and goings of RNA polymerase. J Bacteriol. 1998; 180(12):3019-25. PMC: 107799. DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.12.3019-3025.1998. View

4.
Kenri T, Imamoto F, Kano Y . Three tandemly repeated structural genes encoding tRNA(f1Met) in the metZ operon of Escherichia coli K-12. Gene. 1994; 138(1-2):261-2. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90821-4. View

5.
Dieci G, Sentenac A . Facilitated recycling pathway for RNA polymerase III. Cell. 1996; 84(2):245-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80979-4. View