Distinct and Contrasting Transcription Initiation Patterns at Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Promoters
Overview
Affiliations
Although sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome lead to better understanding of transcription units and gene functions, interactions occurring during transcription initiation between RNA polymerase and promoters is yet to be elucidated. Different stages of transcription initiation include promoter specific binding of RNAP, isomerization, abortive initiation and promoter clearance. We have now analyzed these events with four promoters of M. tuberculosis viz. P(gyrB1), P(gyrR), P(rrnPCL1) and P(metU). The promoters differed from each other in their rates of open complex formation, decay, promoter clearance and abortive transcription. The equilibrium binding and kinetic studies of various steps revealed distinct rate limiting events for each of the promoter, which also differed markedly in their characteristics from the respective promoters of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Surprisingly, the transcription at gyr promoter was enhanced in the presence of initiating nucleotides and decreased in the presence of alarmone, pppGpp, a pattern typically seen with rRNA promoters studied so far. The gyr promoter of M. smegmatis, on the other hand, was not subjected to pppGpp mediated regulation. The marked differences in the transcription initiation pathway seen with rrn and gyr promoters of M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis suggest that such species specific differences in the regulation of expression of the crucial housekeeping genes could be one of the key determinants contributing to the differences in growth rate and lifestyle of the two organisms. Moreover, the distinct rate limiting steps during transcription initiation of each one of the promoters studied point at variations in their intracellular regulation.
Jha R, Udupa S, Rai A, Rani P, Singh P, Govind S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):5802.
PMID: 32242064 PMC: 7118132. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62703-7.
Physiology and Transcriptional Analysis of (p)ppGpp-Related Regulatory Effects in .
Ruwe M, Persicke M, Busche T, Muller B, Kalinowski J Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:2769.
PMID: 31849906 PMC: 6892785. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02769.
Jensen D, Ruiz Manzano A, Rammohan J, Stallings C, Galburt E Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(13):6685-6698.
PMID: 31127308 PMC: 6648326. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz449.
The stringent response and Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis.
Prusa J, Zhu D, Stallings C Pathog Dis. 2018; 76(5).
PMID: 29947752 PMC: 7191866. DOI: 10.1093/femspd/fty054.
MicroRNA signatures from multidrug‑resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Ren N, Gao G, Sun Y, Zhang L, Wang H, Hua W Mol Med Rep. 2015; 12(5):6561-7.
PMID: 26324150 PMC: 4626138. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4262.