» Articles » PMID: 22962623

Where Do the Eyes Really Go in the Hollow-face Illusion?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Sep 11
PMID 22962623
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The hollow-face illusion refers to the finding that people typically perceive a concave (hollow) mask as being convex, despite the presence of binocular disparity cues that indicate the contrary. Unlike other illusions of depth, recent research has suggested that the eyes tend to converge at perceived, rather than actual, depths. However, technical and methodological limitations prevented one from knowing whether disparity cues may still have influenced vergence. In the current study, we presented participants with virtual normal or hollow masks and asked them to fixate the tip of the face's nose until they had indicated whether they perceived it as pointing towards or away from them. The results showed that the direction of vergence was indeed determined by perceived depth, although vergence responses were both somewhat delayed and of smaller amplitude (by a factor of about 0.5) for concave than convex masks. These findings demonstrate how perceived depth can override disparity cues when it comes to vergence, albeit not entirely.

Citing Articles

Size matters: How reaching and vergence movements are influenced by the familiar size of stereoscopically presented objects.

Schubert R, Jung M, Helmert J, Velichkovsky B, Pannasch S PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225311.

PMID: 31747431 PMC: 6867642. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225311.


Gaze3DFix: Detecting 3D fixations with an ellipsoidal bounding volume.

Weber S, Schubert R, Vogt S, Velichkovsky B, Pannasch S Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(5):2004-2015.

PMID: 29076105 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0969-4.

References
1.
Semmlow J, Pedrono C, Alvarez T . Saccadic behavior during the response to pure vergence stimuli. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007; 2007:4854-7. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353427. View

2.
Semmlow J, Yuan W . Adaptive modification of disparity vergence components: an independent component analysis study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(7):2189-95. View

3.
Garofeanu C, Kroliczak G, Goodale M, Humphrey G . Naming and grasping common objects: a priming study. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 159(1):55-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1932-z. View

4.
Hartung B, Schrater P, Bulthoff H, Kersten D, Franz V . Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching?. J Vis. 2005; 5(6):504-14. DOI: 10.1167/5.6.2. View

5.
Wismeijer D, van Ee R, Erkelens C . Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 184(1):61-70. PMC: 2048826. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1081-2. View