» Articles » PMID: 22934151

A Prospective, Multinational Pharmacoepidemiological Study of Clinical Conversion to Sirolimus Immunosuppression After Renal Transplantation

Overview
Journal J Transplant
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2012 Aug 31
PMID 22934151
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective pharmacoepidemiological study examined treatment and outcomes in patients converted to sirolimus (SRL) after renal transplantation. 484 subjects in 36 centres in 7 countries were followed for up to 5 years. Principal reasons for conversion were declining graft function (146/484, 30%) and side effects of prior therapy (144/484, 30%) and the major treatment combinations after conversion were SRL ± MMF (62%), SRL + TAC (21.5%), SRL + CSA (16.5%). The cumulative probability of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) was 5% (n = 22), death-censored graft loss 12% (n = 56) and death 6% (n = 22), and there was no significant relationship to the treatment combination employed. Median calculated creatinine clearance was 48.4 (29.3, 64.5) mL/min at conversion, rising to 54.1 (41.2, 69.0) mL/min at month 1, 55.7 (39.0, 73.0) mL/min at month 12, 58.6 (39.7, 75.2) mL/min at two years and 60.9 (36.0, 77.0) mL/min at three years post-conversion. The most common adverse events were hypertension (47%), hyperlipidemia (26%), urinary tract infections (25%), anaemia (24%) and diarrhea (14%), and cardiac events, hyperlipemia and CMV infection were more common in patients converted during the first year. SRL was most frequently combined with MMF after conversion, but principal clinical outcomes were not significantly influenced by the treatment combination employed in normal practice.

Citing Articles

mTOR Inhibition with Sirolimus in Multiple System Atrophy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Futility Trial and 1-Year Biomarker Longitudinal Analysis.

Palma J, Martinez J, Millar Vernetti P, Ma T, Perez M, Zhong J Mov Disord. 2022; 37(4):778-789.

PMID: 35040506 PMC: 9018525. DOI: 10.1002/mds.28923.

References
1.
Stallone G, Di Paolo S, Schena A, Infante B, Grandaliano G, Battaglia M . Early withdrawal of cyclosporine A improves 1-year kidney graft structure and function in sirolimus-treated patients. Transplantation. 2003; 75(7):998-1003. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000057240.95073.35. View

2.
Greene T . Are observational studies 'just as effective' as randomized clinical trials?. Blood Purif. 2000; 18(4):317-22. DOI: 10.1159/000014455. View

3.
Kahan B, Kramer W . Median effect analysis of efficacy versus adverse effects of immunosuppressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 70(1):74-81. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.116309. View

4.
Machado P, Garcia C, Felipe C, Garcia R, Franco M, Delcelo R . A single-center open label randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of the use of sirolimus versus azathioprine in one-haplotype living related kidney transplant recipients-preliminary results. Transplant Proc. 2001; 33(1-2):1074-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)02421-0. View

5.
Monaco A . The role of mTOR inhibitors in the management of posttransplant malignancy. Transplantation. 2009; 87(2):157-63. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318193886e. View