» Articles » PMID: 22931200

Long-term Skeletal and Dental Effects and Treatment Timing for Functional Appliances in Class II Malocclusion

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Aug 31
PMID 22931200
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To analyze the long-term skeletal and dentoalveolar effects and to evaluate treatment timing of Class II treatment with functional appliances followed by fixed appliances.

Materials And Methods: A group of 40 patients (22 females and 18 males) with Class II malocclusion consecutively treated either with a Bionator or an Activator followed by fixed appliances was compared with a control group of 20 subjects (9 females and 11 males) with untreated Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms were available at the start of treatment (mean age 10 years), end of treatment with functional appliances (mean age 12 years), and long-term observation (mean age 18.6 years). The treated sample also was divided into two groups according to skeletal maturity. The early-treatment group was composed of 20 subjects (12 females and 8 males) treated before puberty, while the late-treatment group included 20 subjects (10 females and 10 males) treated at puberty. Statistical comparisons were performed with analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc tests.

Results: Significant long-term mandibular changes (Co-Gn) in the treated group (3.6 mm over the controls) were associated with improvements in the skeletal sagittal intermaxillary relationship, overjet, and molar relationship (∼3.0-3.5 mm). Treatment during the pubertal peak was able to produce significantly greater increases in total mandibular length (4.3 mm) and mandibular ramus height (3.1 mm) associated with a significant advancement of the bony chin (3.9 mm) when compared with treatment before puberty.

Conclusion: Treatment of Class II malocclusion with functional appliances appears to be more effective at puberty.

Citing Articles

The combination of odontogenic stem cells and mandibular advancement promotes the length of the mandible in adult rats by facilitating the development of condylar cartilage.

Cheng X, Huang L, Wang H, Lei S, Chan C, Yang X Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):441.

PMID: 39563452 PMC: 11577791. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-04055-x.


Soft Tissue Facial Morphology in Growing Patients with Different Occlusal Classes.

Cenzato N, Farronato M, Tartaglia F, Giannini L, Inchingolo A, Dipalma G J Pers Med. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452549 PMC: 11508687. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14101042.


Is hand-wrist radiography still necessary in orthodontic treatment planning?.

Bulut M, Hezenci Y BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):616.

PMID: 38802759 PMC: 11131214. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04396-2.


Effects of Removable Functional Appliances on the Dentoalveolar Unit in Growing Patients.

Cardarelli F, Drago S, Rizzi L, Bazzani M, Pesce P, Menini M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(5).

PMID: 38792929 PMC: 11123302. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050746.


Impact of initial lip competence on the outcome of class II functional appliances therapy.

Sambale J, Jablonski-Momeni A, Korbmacher-Steiner H Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(2):126.

PMID: 38286891 PMC: 10824814. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05511-x.


References
1.
Chayanupatkul A, Rabie A, Hagg U . Temporomandibular response to early and late removal of bite-jumping devices. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25(5):465-70. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.5.465. View

2.
McNamara Jr J, Bookstein F, Shaughnessy T . Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88(2):91-110. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90233-7. View

3.
Tulloch J, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit W . The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111(4):391-400. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)80021-2. View

4.
Rudzki-Janson I, Noachtar R . Functional appliance therapy with the Bionator. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4(1):33-45. DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80040-6. View

5.
Cozza P, Toffol L, Iacopini L . An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment. Angle Orthod. 2005; 74(6):741-8. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0741:AAOTCC>2.0.CO;2. View