» Articles » PMID: 22924334

Addressing Alcohol Use and Problems in Mandated College Students: a Randomized Clinical Trial Using Stepped Care

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Aug 29
PMID 22924334
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Over the past 2 decades, colleges and universities have seen a large increase in the number of students referred to the administration for alcohol policies violations. However, a substantial portion of mandated students may not require extensive treatment. Stepped care may maximize treatment efficiency and greatly reduce the demands on campus alcohol programs.

Method: Participants in the study (N = 598) were college students mandated to attend an alcohol program following a campus-based alcohol citation. All participants received Step 1: a 15-min brief advice session that included the provision of a booklet containing advice to reduce drinking. Participants were assessed 6 weeks after receiving the brief advice, and those who continued to exhibit risky alcohol use (n = 405) were randomized to Step 2, a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (n = 211), or an assessment-only control (n = 194). Follow-up assessments were conducted 3, 6, and 9 months after Step 2.

Results: Results indicated that the participants who received a brief motivational intervention showed a significantly reduced number of alcohol-related problems compared to those who received assessment only, despite no significant group differences in alcohol use. In addition, low-risk drinkers (n = 102; who reported low alcohol use and related harms at 6-week follow-up and were not randomized to stepped care) showed a stable alcohol use pattern throughout the follow-up period, indicating they required no additional intervention.

Conclusion: Stepped care is an efficient and cost-effective method to reduce harms associated with alcohol use by mandated students.

Citing Articles

Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.

Schwenker R, Dietrich C, Hirpa S, Nothacker M, Smedslund G, Frese T Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 12:CD008063.

PMID: 38084817 PMC: 10714668. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.


Optimizing adaptive stepped-care interventions to change adults' health behaviors: A systematic review.

Roddy M, Pfammatter A, Mayberry L J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e190.

PMID: 37745938 PMC: 10514691. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.618.


Injunctive and descriptive normative feedback for college drinking prevention: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?.

Larimer M, Graupensperger S, Lewis M, Cronce J, Kilmer J, Atkins D Psychol Addict Behav. 2022; 37(3):447-461.

PMID: 36480396 PMC: 11162751. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000893.


Peer-led interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in college students: A scoping review.

Lavilla-Gracia M, Pueyo-Garrigues M, Pueyo-Garrigues S, Pardavila-Belio M, Canga-Armayor A, Esandi N Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e3562-e3578.

PMID: 36057959 PMC: 10087199. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13990.


Using machine learning to predict heavy drinking during outpatient alcohol treatment.

Roberts W, Zhao Y, Verplaetse T, Moore K, Peltier M, Burke C Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022; 46(4):657-666.

PMID: 35420710 PMC: 9180421. DOI: 10.1111/acer.14802.


References
1.
Walters S, Wright J, Shegog R . A review of computer and Internet-based interventions for smoking behavior. Addict Behav. 2005; 31(2):264-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.002. View

2.
Kahler C, Strong D, Read J . Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: the brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005; 29(7):1180-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000171940.95813.a5. View

3.
Kazdin A, Nock M . Delineating mechanisms of change in child and adolescent therapy: methodological issues and research recommendations. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003; 44(8):1116-29. DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00195. View

4.
Zisserson R, Palfai T, Saitz R . 'No-contact' interventions for unhealthy college drinking:efficacy of alternatives to person-delivered intervention approaches. Subst Abus. 2007; 28(4):119-31. DOI: 10.1300/J465v28n04_04. View

5.
Laforge R, Borsari B, Baer J . The utility of collateral informant assessment in college alcohol research: results from a longitudinal prevention trial. J Stud Alcohol. 2005; 66(4):479-87. PMC: 3734383. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.479. View