» Articles » PMID: 22917193

Very High Gravity Ethanol Fermentation by Flocculating Yeast Under Redox Potential-controlled Conditions

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2012 Aug 25
PMID 22917193
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Very high gravity (VHG) fermentation using medium in excess of 250 g/L sugars for more than 15% (v) ethanol can save energy consumption, not only for ethanol distillation, but also for distillage treatment; however, stuck fermentation with prolonged fermentation time and more sugars unfermented is the biggest challenge. Controlling redox potential (ORP) during VHG fermentation benefits biomass accumulation and improvement of yeast cell viability that is affected by osmotic pressure and ethanol inhibition, enhancing ethanol productivity and yield, the most important techno-economic aspect of fuel ethanol production.

Results: Batch fermentation was performed under different ORP conditions using the flocculating yeast and media containing glucose of 201 ± 3.1, 252 ± 2.9 and 298 ± 3.8 g/L. Compared with ethanol fermentation by non-flocculating yeast, different ORP profiles were observed with the flocculating yeast due to the morphological change associated with the flocculation of yeast cells. When ORP was controlled at -100 mV, ethanol fermentation with the high gravity (HG) media containing glucose of 201 ± 3.1 and 252 ± 2.9 g/L was completed at 32 and 56 h, respectively, producing 93.0 ± 1.3 and 120.0 ± 1.8 g/L ethanol, correspondingly. In contrast, there were 24.0 ± 0.4 and 17.0 ± 0.3 g/L glucose remained unfermented without ORP control. As high as 131.0 ± 1.8 g/L ethanol was produced at 72 h when ORP was controlled at -150 mV for the VHG fermentation with medium containing 298 ± 3.8 g/L glucose, since yeast cell viability was improved more significantly.

Conclusions: No lag phase was observed during ethanol fermentation with the flocculating yeast, and the implementation of ORP control improved ethanol productivity and yield. When ORP was controlled at -150 mV, more reducing power was available for yeast cells to survive, which in turn improved their viability and VHG ethanol fermentation performance. On the other hand, controlling ORP at -100 mV stimulated yeast growth and enhanced ethanol production under the HG conditions. Moreover, the ORP profile detected during ethanol fermentation with the flocculating yeast was less fluctuated, indicating that yeast flocculation could attenuate the ORP fluctuation observed during ethanol fermentation with non-flocculating yeast.

Citing Articles

for lignocellulosic ethanol production: a look at key attributes and genome shuffling.

Tsegaye K, Alemnew M, Berhane N Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1466644.

PMID: 39386039 PMC: 11461319. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1466644.


Potential of as an electricity producer in ethanol production.

Geng B, Cao L, Li F, Song H, Liu C, Zhao X Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020; 13:36.

PMID: 32158500 PMC: 7057670. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01672-5.


Raising the avermectins production in Streptomyces avermitilis by utilizing nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs).

Guo J, Ma R, Su B, Li Y, Zhang J, Fang J Sci Rep. 2016; 6:25949.

PMID: 27181521 PMC: 4867605. DOI: 10.1038/srep25949.


An environmentally friendly and productive process for bioethanol production from potato waste.

Wang F, Jiang Y, Guo W, Niu K, Zhang R, Hou S Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016; 9:50.

PMID: 26941837 PMC: 4776430. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0464-7.

References
1.
Zhao X, Bai F . Yeast flocculation: New story in fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv. 2009; 27(6):849-856. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.006. View

2.
Ge X, Zhao X, Bai F . Online monitoring and characterization of flocculating yeast cell flocs during continuous ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005; 90(5):523-31. DOI: 10.1002/bit.20391. View

3.
Yu Y, Wang Y, Chu J, Zhuang Y, Zhang S . [The influence of controlling redox potential on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2007; 23(5):878-84. DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2075(07)60054-5. View

4.
Hu C, Bai F, An L . [Effect of flocculence of a self-flocculating yeast on its tolerance to ethanol and the mechanism]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2005; 21(1):123-8. View

5.
Sheu D, Duan K, Jou S, Chen Y, Chen C . Production of xylitol from Candida tropicalis by using an oxidation-reduction potential-stat controlled fermentation. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 25(24):2065-9. View