» Articles » PMID: 22916073

The Invasion and Reproductive Toxicity of QDs-Transferrin Bioconjugates on Preantral Follicle in Vitro

Overview
Journal Theranostics
Date 2012 Aug 24
PMID 22916073
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The toxicity of QD has been extensively studied over the past decade. However, the potential toxicity of QDs impedes its use for clinical research. In this work, we established a preantral follicle in vitro culture system to investigate the effects of QD-Transferrin (QDs-Tf) bioconjugates on follicle development and oocyte maturation. The preantral follicles were cultured and exposed to CdTe/ZnTe QDs-Tf bioconjugates with various concentrations and the reproductive toxicity was assessed at different time points post-treatment. The invasion of QDs-Tf for oocytes was verified by laser scanning confocal microscope. Steroid production was evaluated by immunoassay. C-band Giemsa staining was performed to observe the chromosome abnormality of oocytes. The results showed that the QDs-Tf bioconjugates could permeate into granulosa cells and theca cells, but not into oocyte. There are no obvious changes of oocyte diameter, the mucification of cumulus-oocyte-complexes and the occurrence of aneulpoidy as compared with the control group. However, delay in the antrum formation and decrease in the ratio of oocytes with first polar body were observed in QDs-Tf-treated groups. The matured oocytes with first polar body decreased significantly by ~16% (from 79.6±10 % to 63±2.9 %) when the concentration of QDs-Tf bioconjugates exceeded 2.89 nmol·L(-1) (P < 0.05). Our results implied that the CdTe/ZnTe QDs-Tf bioconjugates were reproductive toxic for follicle development, and thus also revealed that this in vitro culture system of preantral follicle is a highly sensitive tool for study on the reproductive toxicity of nanoparticles.

Citing Articles

Current Advances in the Biomedical Applications of Quantum Dots: Promises and Challenges.

Le N, Kim K Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).

PMID: 37628860 PMC: 10454335. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612682.


Red CdSe/ZnS QDs' Intracellular Trafficking and Its Impact on Yeast Polarization and Actin Filament.

Le N, Routh J, Kirk C, Wu Q, Patel R, Keyes C Cells. 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36766825 PMC: 9914768. DOI: 10.3390/cells12030484.


In vitro growth (IVG) of human ovarian follicles in frozen thawed ovarian cortex tissue culture supplemented with follicular fluid under hypoxic conditions.

Schallmoser A, Einenkel R, Farber C, Sanger N Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 306(4):1299-1311.

PMID: 35871693 PMC: 9470640. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06672-4.


Eugenol Improves Follicular Survival and Development During Culture of Goat Ovarian Tissue.

Silva R, Lima L, Ferreira A, Silva A, Alves D, Alves B Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:822367.

PMID: 35573397 PMC: 9096615. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.822367.


Relative expression of microRNAs, apoptosis, and ultrastructure anomalies induced by gold nanoparticles in Trachyderma hispida (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).

El-Ashram S, Kheirallah D, El-Samad L, Toto N PLoS One. 2020; 15(11):e0241837.

PMID: 33156883 PMC: 7647063. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241837.


References
1.
Alivisatos A, Gu W, Larabell C . Quantum dots as cellular probes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005; 7:55-76. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.060804.100432. View

2.
Stelzer R, Hutz R . Gold nanoparticles enter rat ovarian granulosa cells and subcellular organelles, and alter in-vitro estrogen accumulation. J Reprod Dev. 2009; 55(6):685-90. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.20241. View

3.
Qian J, Yong K, Roy I, Ohulchanskyy T, Bergey E, Lee H . Imaging pancreatic cancer using surface-functionalized quantum dots. J Phys Chem B. 2007; 111(25):6969-72. DOI: 10.1021/jp070620n. View

4.
Gao X, Yang L, Petros J, Marshall F, Simons J, Nie S . In vivo molecular and cellular imaging with quantum dots. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005; 16(1):63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.11.003. View

5.
Cortvrindt R, Smitz J . Follicle culture in reproductive toxicology: a tool for in-vitro testing of ovarian function?. Hum Reprod Update. 2002; 8(3):243-54. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/8.3.243. View