» Articles » PMID: 229160

Comparison of Immunofluorescence and Radioimmunoassay for Detecting IgM Antibody in Infants with the Congenital Rubella Syndrome

Overview
Journal J Hyg (Lond)
Specialty Public Health
Date 1979 Dec 1
PMID 229160
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immunofluorescence (IF) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) have been compared as methods for detecting IgM antibody in 124 infants with confirmed or suspected congenital rubella. IF was used to test sucrose density gradient fractions and RIA to test fractions and whole serum. When fractions were tested IF and RIA were equally specific and distinguished clearly between IgM and IgG, but RIA was the more sensitive method. The RIA titre in whole serum was always greater than in the peak IgM fraction and there was no evidence that testing the serum, rather than the fraction, could result in failure to detect IgM. With some sera RIA gave low titres which became negative after absorption with IgG-coated latex beads. The mechanism of this 'false positive' effect, which may have been due to IgM with anti-IgG activity, was not investigated, but if it can be removed by absorption it need not reduce the specificity of the test. During the first 6 months of life IgM antibody was detected by RIA in 30 out of 32 unfractionated sera and by IF in fractions from 28 of these. After the age of 6 months IgM was found progressively less frequently and the greater sensitivity of RIA became a more obvious advantage: 17 out of 60 specimens were positive by RIA and 11 of these were negative by IF. RIA testing of whole serum appears to be an economical, specific and sensitive method for detecting IgM antibody in congenital rubella, of particular value when the titre of antibody is low.

Citing Articles

Antibody capture radioimmunoassay for anti-rubella IgM.

Mortimer P, Tedder R, Hamblig M, Shafi M, Burkhardt F, Schilt U J Hyg (Lond). 1981; 86(2):139-53.

PMID: 7462599 PMC: 2133867. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400068856.


Fetal infection resulting from maternal rubella after the first trimester of pregnancy.

CRADOCK-WATSON J, Ridehalgh M, Anderson M, Pattison J, Kangro H J Hyg (Lond). 1980; 85(3):381-91.

PMID: 7462590 PMC: 2134019. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400063452.


Comparison of radioimmunoassay and the gel filtration technique for routine diagnosis of rubella during pregnancy.

Kangro H, Jackson C, Heath R J Hyg (Lond). 1981; 87(2):249-55.

PMID: 7288178 PMC: 2134043. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400069461.


Outcome of asymptomatic infection with rubella virus during pregnancy.

CRADOCK-WATSON J, Ridehalgh M, Anderson M, Pattison J J Hyg (Lond). 1981; 87(2):147-54.

PMID: 7288170 PMC: 2134037. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400069345.


Rubella-specific IgM detected by an antibody capture assay/ELISA technique.

Kurtz J, Malic A J Clin Pathol. 1981; 34(12):1392-5.

PMID: 7035501 PMC: 494615. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.34.12.1392.


References
1.
De Silva L, Kampfner G, Lister C, TOBIN J . Identification of pregnancies at risk from cytomegalovirus infection. J Hyg (Lond). 1977; 79(3):347-54. PMC: 2129950. DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400053183. View

2.
Pattison J, Jackson C, Hiscock J, CRADOCK-WATSON J, Ridehalgh M . Comparison of methods for detecting specific IgM antibody in infants with congenital rubella. J Med Microbiol. 1978; 11(4):411-8. DOI: 10.1099/00222615-11-4-411. View

3.
Kangro H, Pattison J, Heath R . The detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies by radioimmunoassay. Br J Exp Pathol. 1978; 59(6):577-83. PMC: 2041413. View

4.
Chantler S, Devries E, ALLEN P, HURN B . A rapid immunofluorescent procedure for the detection of specific IgG and IgM antibody in sera using Staphylococcus aureus and latex-IgG as absorbents. J Immunol Methods. 1976; 13(3-4):367-80. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(76)90083-1. View

5.
MEURMAN O, Viljanen M, Granfors K . Solid-phase radioimmunoassay of rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies: comparison with sucrose density gradient centrifugation test. J Clin Microbiol. 1977; 5(3):257-62. PMC: 274578. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.5.3.257-262.1977. View