Evidence for Discrete-state Processing in Recognition Memory

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2012 Aug 22

PMID 22908285

Citations 27

Authors

Jordan M Province

Jeffrey N Rouder

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We provide evidence that recognition memory is mediated by a detect-or-guess mental-state model without recourse to concepts of latent-strength or multiple-memory systems. We assess performance in a two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory task with confidence ratings. The key manipulation is that sometimes participants are asked which of two new items is old, and the resulting confidence distribution is unambiguously interpreted as arising from a guessing state. The confidence ratings for other conditions are seemingly the resultant of mixing this stable guessing state with an additional stable detect state. Formal model comparison supports this observation, and an analysis of associated response times reveals a mixture signature as well.

Citing Articles

Sometimes memory misleads: Variants of the error-speed effect strengthen the evidence for systematically misleading memory signals in recognition memory.

Voormann A, Rothe-Wulf A, Meyer-Grant C, Klauer K Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):294-305.

PMID: 38954156 PMC: 11836095. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02534-z.

Working memory limitations constrain visual episodic long-term memory at both specific and gist levels of representation.

Greene N, Guitard D, Forsberg A, Cowan N, Naveh-Benjamin M Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(8):1958-1982.

PMID: 38839653 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01593-w.

Do moments of inattention during study cause the error-speed effect for targets in recognition-memory tasks?.

Voormann A, Meyer-Grant C, Rothe-Wulf A, Klauer K Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(5):2180-2188.

PMID: 38409500 PMC: 11543768. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02475-7.

Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.

Brady T, Robinson M, Williams J, Wixted J Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(2):421-449.

PMID: 36260270 PMC: 10257388. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02179-w.

You cannot "count" how many items people remember in visual working memory: The importance of signal detection-based measures for understanding change detection performance.

Williams J, Robinson M, Schurgin M, Wixted J, Brady T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022; 48(12):1390-1409.

PMID: 36222675 PMC: 10257385. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0001055.

References

Murdock B . TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychol Rev. 1993; 100(2):183-203. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.183. View

Yonelinas A . Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994; 20(6):1341-54. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1341. View

Yonelinas A, Parks C . Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychol Bull. 2007; 133(5):800-32. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800. View

Sikstrom S, Jonsson F . A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning. Psychol Rev. 2005; 112(4):932-50. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.932. View

Broder A, Schutz J . Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009; 35(3):587-606. DOI: 10.1037/a0015279. View

Malmberg K . On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002; 28(2):380-7. View

Qin J, Raye C, Johnson M, Mitchell K . Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 27(4):1110-5. View

Shiffrin R, Steyvers M . A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 4(2):145-66. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209391. View

Kinchla R . Comments on Batchelder and Riefer's multinomial model for source monitoring. Psychol Rev. 1994; 101(1):166-771; discussion 172-6. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.166. View

10.

Luce R . A threshold theory for simple detection experiments. Psychol Rev. 1963; 70:61-79. DOI: 10.1037/h0039723. View

11.

McClelland J, Chappell M . Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychol Rev. 1998; 105(4):724-60. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.4.734-760. View

12.

Rouder J, Speckman P, Sun D, Morey R, Iverson G . Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(2):225-37. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225. View

13.

Slotnick S, Dodson C . Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Mem Cognit. 2005; 33(1):151-70. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195305. View