» Articles » PMID: 22907974

Randomized Multicenter and Stratified Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Alone Versus Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic or Relapsed Leiomyosarcomas: a Federation Nationale Des Centres De Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) French Sarcoma...

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with uterine and nonuterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).

Patients And Methods: Patients had metastatic or unresectable LMS and had received one prior anthracycline-based regimen. A total of 90 patients received either single-agent gemcitabine (arm A; gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. for 100 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (arm B; gemcitabine, 900 mg/m(2) i.v. for 90 minutes on days 1 and 8, plus docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) i.v. for 1 hour on day 8 of a 21-day cycle with lenograstim). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

Results: The objective response rates were 19% and 24% in arm A (gemcitabine) and arm B (gemcitabine plus docetaxel), respectively, for patients with uterine LMS. For patients with nonuterine LMS, the objective response rates were 14% and 5% for arms A and B, respectively. The median progression-free survival times for arms A and B were 5.5 months and 4.7 months, respectively, for patients with uterine LMS. For patients with nonuterine LMS, the median progression-free survival times were 6.3 months and 3.8 months for arms A and B, respectively. One toxic death occurred in arm B.

Conclusions: Both single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine plus docetaxel were found to be effective second-line therapies for leiomyosarcomas, with a 3-month progression-free survival rate of 40% for LMS with both uterine and nonuterine sites of origin. Single-agent gemcitabine yielded results similar to those of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in this trial, but patients using single-agent gemcitabine experienced less toxicity.

Citing Articles

Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Identifying the Appropriate Dose and Schedule.

Nakano K, Hayashi N, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Urasaki T, Fukuda N Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76149.

PMID: 39834961 PMC: 11745528. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76149.


Phase 2 trial of avelumab in combination with gemcitabine in advanced leiomyosarcoma as a second-line treatment (EAGLES, Korean Cancer Study Group UN18-09).

Kim M, Kim Y, Suh K, Kim S, Kim J, Jeong J Cancer. 2024; 131(1):e35609.

PMID: 39422602 PMC: 11694233. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35609.


Beneficial Use of the Combination of Gemcitabine and Dacarbazine in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Real-World Data.

Gurruchaga Sotes I, Gomez-Mateo M, Ortega Izquierdo M, Martinez-Trufero J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38254758 PMC: 10813902. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020267.


Treatment patterns and outcomes for primary uterine leiomyosarcoma with synchronous isolated lung metastases: A National Cancer Database study of primary resection and metastasectomy.

Istl A, Desravines N, Nudotor R, Stone R, Greer J, Meyer C Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024; 51:101308.

PMID: 38174328 PMC: 10758710. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101308.


Efficacy and toxicities of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in the second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Niu S, Sun L, Hsu S, Hwang S, Liu C, Shih Y Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1282596.

PMID: 38090488 PMC: 10714004. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1282596.


References
1.
Oosten A, Seynaeve C, Schmitz P, den Bakker M, Verweij J, Sleijfer S . Outcomes of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic leiomyosarcoma of uterine and non-uterine origin. Sarcoma. 2010; 2009:348910. PMC: 2801456. DOI: 10.1155/2009/348910. View

2.
Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V, Hainsworth J, Hochster H, Lenzi R . Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(18):3402-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.140. View

3.
Zucali P, Bertuzzi A, Soto Parra H, Campagnoli E, Quagliuolo V, Santoro A . The "old drug" dacarbazine as a second/third line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Invest New Drugs. 2007; 26(2):175-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-007-9086-z. View

4.
Sutton G, Blessing J, MALFETANO J . Ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 62(2):226-9. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0220. View

5.
Sutton G, Blessing J, Barrett R, McGehee R . Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166(2):556-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91671-v. View