Randomized Multicenter and Stratified Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Alone Versus Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Patients with Metastatic or Relapsed Leiomyosarcomas: a Federation Nationale Des Centres De Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) French Sarcoma...
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with uterine and nonuterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
Patients And Methods: Patients had metastatic or unresectable LMS and had received one prior anthracycline-based regimen. A total of 90 patients received either single-agent gemcitabine (arm A; gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. for 100 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (arm B; gemcitabine, 900 mg/m(2) i.v. for 90 minutes on days 1 and 8, plus docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) i.v. for 1 hour on day 8 of a 21-day cycle with lenograstim). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.
Results: The objective response rates were 19% and 24% in arm A (gemcitabine) and arm B (gemcitabine plus docetaxel), respectively, for patients with uterine LMS. For patients with nonuterine LMS, the objective response rates were 14% and 5% for arms A and B, respectively. The median progression-free survival times for arms A and B were 5.5 months and 4.7 months, respectively, for patients with uterine LMS. For patients with nonuterine LMS, the median progression-free survival times were 6.3 months and 3.8 months for arms A and B, respectively. One toxic death occurred in arm B.
Conclusions: Both single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine plus docetaxel were found to be effective second-line therapies for leiomyosarcomas, with a 3-month progression-free survival rate of 40% for LMS with both uterine and nonuterine sites of origin. Single-agent gemcitabine yielded results similar to those of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in this trial, but patients using single-agent gemcitabine experienced less toxicity.
Nakano K, Hayashi N, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Urasaki T, Fukuda N Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76149.
PMID: 39834961 PMC: 11745528. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76149.
Kim M, Kim Y, Suh K, Kim S, Kim J, Jeong J Cancer. 2024; 131(1):e35609.
PMID: 39422602 PMC: 11694233. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35609.
Gurruchaga Sotes I, Gomez-Mateo M, Ortega Izquierdo M, Martinez-Trufero J Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).
PMID: 38254758 PMC: 10813902. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020267.
Istl A, Desravines N, Nudotor R, Stone R, Greer J, Meyer C Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024; 51:101308.
PMID: 38174328 PMC: 10758710. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101308.
Niu S, Sun L, Hsu S, Hwang S, Liu C, Shih Y Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1282596.
PMID: 38090488 PMC: 10714004. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1282596.