» Articles » PMID: 22900930

Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Efficacy of Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Preventing Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2012 Aug 21
PMID 22900930
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The goal of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) in preventing POAF in adult patients undergoing CABG.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify randomized controlled trails in adult patients undergoing CABG who were randomly assigned to receive general anesthesia plus thoracic epidural anesthesia (GA + TEA) or general anesthesia only (GA). Two authors independently extracted data using a standardized Excel file. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of POAF. We used DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models to compute summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Five studies involving 540 patients met our inclusion criteria. No significant difference in the incidence of POAF was observed between the two groups (risk ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 1.12; P = 0.11), with significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 73%, P = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses by primary endpoint, methodological quality and surgical technique yielded similar results.

Conclusions: The limited evidence suggests that TEA shows no beneficial efficacy in preventing POAF in adult patients undergoing CABG. However, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to significant heterogeneity of the studies included. Thus, the potential infuence of TEA on the incidence of atrial fibrillation following CABG warrants further investigation.

Citing Articles

Antiarrhythmic Mechanisms of Epidural Blockade After Myocardial Infarction.

Hoang J, van Weperen V, Kang K, Jani N, Swid M, Chan C Circ Res. 2024; 135(3):e57-e75.

PMID: 38939925 PMC: 11257785. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.324058.

References
1.
Scott N, Turfrey D, Ray D, Nzewi O, Sutcliffe N, Lal A . A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg. 2001; 93(3):528-35. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200109000-00003. View

2.
de Vries A, Mariani M, van der Maaten J, Loef B, Lip H . To ventilate or not after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: the role of epidural anesthesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002; 16(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2002.29645. View

3.
Mauldin P, Weintraub W, BECKER E . Predicting hospital costs for first-time coronary artery bypass grafting from preoperative and postoperative variables. Am J Cardiol. 1994; 74(8):772-5. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90432-4. View

4.
Aranki S, Shaw D, Adams D, Rizzo R, Couper G, VanderVliet M . Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996; 94(3):390-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.390. View

5.
Fillinger M, Yeager M, Dodds T, Fillinger M, Whalen P, Glass D . Epidural anesthesia and analgesia: effects on recovery from cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002; 16(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2002.29639. View