» Articles » PMID: 22886547

How Conservative Are Evolutionary Anthropologists?: a Survey of Political Attitudes

Overview
Journal Hum Nat
Date 2012 Aug 14
PMID 22886547
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The application of evolutionary theory to human behavior has elicited a variety of critiques, some of which charge that this approach expresses or encourages conservative or reactionary political agendas. In a survey of graduate students in psychology, Tybur, Miller, and Gangestad (Human Nature, 18, 313-328, 2007) found that the political attitudes of those who use an evolutionary approach did not differ from those of other psychology grad students. Here, we present results from a directed online survey of a broad sample of graduate students in anthropology that assays political views. We found that evolutionary anthropology graduate students were very liberal in their political beliefs, overwhelmingly voted for a liberal U.S. presidential candidate in the 2008 election, and identified with liberal political parties; in this, they were almost indistinguishable from non-evolutionary anthropology students. Our results contradict the view that evolutionary anthropologists hold conservative or reactionary political views. We discuss some possible reasons for the persistence of this view in terms of the sociology of science.

Citing Articles

Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality.

Smith E, Smith J, Codding B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1883):20220287.

PMID: 37381851 PMC: 10291428. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0287.


Sex offender registries: exploring the attitudes and knowledge of political decision-makers.

Jung S, Allison M, Toop C, Martin E Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020; 27(3):478-492.

PMID: 33071553 PMC: 7534266. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1733698.


Exploring the Great Schism in the Social Sciences: Confirmation Bias and the Interpretation of Results Relating to Biological Influences on Human Behavior and Psychology.

Winking J Evol Psychol. 2018; 16(1):1474704917752691.

PMID: 29353493 PMC: 10506139. DOI: 10.1177/1474704917752691.


Modernizing Evolutionary Anthropology : Introduction to the Special Issue.

Mattison S, Sear R Hum Nat. 2016; 27(4):335-350.

PMID: 27614655 DOI: 10.1007/s12110-016-9270-y.

References
1.
Tybur J, Miller G, Gangestad S . Testing the Controversy : An Empirical Examination of Adaptationists' Attitudes Toward Politics and Science. Hum Nat. 2015; 18(4):313-28. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-007-9024-y. View

2.
Masters R . Is sociobiology reactionary? The political implications of inclusive-fitness theory. Q Rev Biol. 1982; 57(3):275-92. DOI: 10.1086/412803. View

3.
Singer M . Farewell to adaptationism: unnatural selection and the politics of biology. Med Anthropol Q. 1996; 10(4):496-515. DOI: 10.1525/maq.1996.10.4.02a00050. View

4.
Singer M . The limitations of medical ecology: the concept of adaptation in the context of social stratification and social transformation. Med Anthropol. 1989; 10(4):223-34. DOI: 10.1080/01459740.1989.9965969. View

5.
Mann C . Scientific community. Anthropological warfare. Science. 2001; 291(5503):416-21. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5503.416. View