» Articles » PMID: 22885784

Contour Enhancement Benefits Older Adults with Simulated Central Field Loss

Overview
Journal Optom Vis Sci
Date 2012 Aug 14
PMID 22885784
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of vision loss among Americans aged >65 years. Currently, no effective treatment can reverse the central vision loss associated with most age-related macular degeneration. Digital image-processing techniques have been developed to improve image visibility for peripheral vision; however, both the selection and efficacy of such methods are limited. Progress has been difficult for two reasons: the exact nature of image enhancement that might benefit peripheral vision is not well understood, and efficient methods for testing such techniques have been elusive. The current study aims to develop both an effective image enhancement technique for peripheral vision and an efficient means for validating the technique.

Methods: We used a novel contour-detection algorithm to locate shape-defining edges in images based on natural-image statistics. We then enhanced the scene by locally boosting the luminance contrast along such contours. Using a gaze-contingent display, we simulated central visual field loss in normally sighted young (aged 18-30 years) and older adults (aged 58-88 years). Visual search performance was measured as a function of contour enhancement strength ["original" (unenhanced), "medium," and "high"]. For preference task, a separate group of subjects judged which image in a pair "would lead to better search performance."

Results: We found that although contour enhancement had no significant effect on search time and accuracy in young adults, Medium enhancement resulted in significantly shorter search time in older adults (about 13% reduction relative to original). Both age-groups preferred images with Medium enhancement over original (2-7 times). Furthermore, across age-groups, image content types, and enhancement strengths, there was a robust correlation between preference and performance.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate a beneficial role of contour enhancement in peripheral vision for older adults. Our findings further suggest that task-specific preference judgments can be an efficient surrogate for performance testing.

Citing Articles

Altered Eye Movements During Reading With Simulated Central and Peripheral Visual Field Defects.

Yu H, Kwon M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(13):21.

PMID: 37843494 PMC: 10584020. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.13.21.


A systematic review of extended reality (XR) for understanding and augmenting vision loss.

Kasowski J, Johnson B, Neydavood R, Akkaraju A, Beyeler M J Vis. 2023; 23(5):5.

PMID: 37140911 PMC: 10166121. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.5.5.


Simulating Macular Degeneration to Investigate Activities of Daily Living: A Systematic Review.

Macnamara A, Chen C, Schinazi V, Saredakis D, Loetscher T Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:663062.

PMID: 34483815 PMC: 8414246. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.663062.


Applications of augmented reality in ophthalmology [Invited].

Aydindogan G, Kavakli K, Sahin A, Artal P, Urey H Biomed Opt Express. 2021; 12(1):511-538.

PMID: 33659087 PMC: 7899512. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.405026.


Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans.

Herpich F, Melnick M, Agosta S, Huxlin K, Tadin D, Battelli L J Neurosci. 2019; 39(28):5551-5561.

PMID: 31133558 PMC: 6616291. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3248-18.2019.


References
1.
Ver Hoeve J . Threshold and suprathreshold spatiotemporal response throughout adulthood. J Opt Soc Am A. 1988; 5(12):2191-200. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.5.002191. View

2.
Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D . Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res. 1983; 23(7):689-99. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90210-9. View

3.
Pidcoe P, Wetzel P . Oculomotor tracking strategy in normal subjects with and without simulated scotoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 47(1):169-78. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0564. View

4.
Superstein R, Boyaner D, Overbury O . Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25(4):575-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80059-5. View

5.
Pointer J, Hess R . The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range. Vision Res. 1989; 29(9):1133-51. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90061-8. View