» Articles » PMID: 22874083

Is There an Association Between the Home Food Environment, the Local Food Shopping Environment and Children's Fruit and Vegetable Intake? Results from the Dutch INPACT Study

Overview
Date 2012 Aug 10
PMID 22874083
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine: (i) the association between home availability of fruit and vegetables and children’s fruit and vegetable intake; (ii) the association between parental perception of the local food shopping environment and the home availability of fruit and vegetables; and (iii) whether the home availability of fruit and vegetables mediates the association between parental perception of the local food environment and children’s fruit and vegetable consumption.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: A total of ninety-one primary schools in the Netherlands.

Subjects: In total 1501 primary caregivers completed a questionnaire to measure children’s fruit and vegetable consumption, home availability of fruit and vegetables, parental perceptions of the local food shopping environment (price, quality and availability), the child’s socio-economic status, the child’s ethnicity and maternal height and weight.

Results: The home availability of fruit and vegetables was positively associated with children’s fruit and vegetable intake (P,0?01 and P,0?001, respectively). Negative parental perceptions of the local food shopping environment were associated with less fruit available at home (P,0?05, P,0?01 and P,0?05 for price, quality and availability of fruit, respectively). No significant associations were found between parental perception of the local food shopping environment and children’s fruit and vegetable consumption. We found no evidence that home availability of fruit and vegetables mediates the association between parental perception of the local food environment and children’s fruit and vegetable intake.

Conclusions: Interventions focusing on improving the home availability of fruit and vegetables may help to increase children’s fruit and vegetable consumption. However, more data are required on factors influencing the home availability of fruit and vegetables.

Citing Articles

Are Dutch adults equally susceptible to nudging and pricing strategies? Secondary analyses of the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Stuber J, Beulens J, van Lierop J, Schuurman E, Lakerveld J, Mackenbach J BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):228.

PMID: 38853270 PMC: 11163734. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03429-5.


Real-world nudging, pricing, and mobile physical activity coaching was insufficient to improve lifestyle behaviours and cardiometabolic health: the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Stuber J, Mackenbach J, de Bruijn G, Gillebaart M, Hoenink J, Middel C BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):52.

PMID: 38303069 PMC: 10835818. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03268-4.


Participant recruitment, baseline characteristics and at-home-measurements of cardiometabolic risk markers: insights from the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Stuber J, van Hoek B, Vos A, Smit E, Lakerveld J, Mackenbach J Trials. 2023; 24(1):159.

PMID: 36864494 PMC: 9981252. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07157-8.


Correction: Reducing cardiometabolic risk in adults with a low socioeconomic position: protocol of the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial.

Stuber J, Mackenbach J, de Boer F, de Bruijn G, Gillebaart M, Harbers M Nutr J. 2022; 21(1):44.

PMID: 35764992 PMC: 9238004. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-022-00795-9.


Perceived Produce Availability and Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake: The Healthy Communities Study.

Moffat L, Ritchie L, Gosliner W, Plank K, Au L Nutrients. 2021; 13(11).

PMID: 34835936 PMC: 8619213. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113681.


References
1.
Giskes K, Van Lenthe F, Kamphuis C, Huisman M, Brug J, Mackenbach J . Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 63(2):113-20. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.078352. View

2.
Brug J, Kremers S, van Lenthe F, Ball K, Crawford D . Environmental determinants of healthy eating: in need of theory and evidence. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008; 67(3):307-16. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665108008616. View

3.
Diethelm K, Jankovic N, Moreno L, Huybrechts I, de Henauw S, De Vriendt T . Food intake of European adolescents in the light of different food-based dietary guidelines: results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 15(3):386-98. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011001935. View

4.
Reinaerts E, de Nooijer J, De Vries N . Parental versus child reporting of fruit and vegetable consumption. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4:33. PMC: 2018700. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-33. View

5.
Kristjansdottir A, Thorsdottir I, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Due P, Wind M, Klepp K . Determinants of fruit and vegetable intake among 11-year-old schoolchildren in a country of traditionally low fruit and vegetable consumption. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3:41. PMC: 1681348. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-41. View