» Articles » PMID: 22868751

Birth Cohort Effects on Adolescent Alcohol Use: the Influence of Social Norms from 1976 to 2007

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2012 Aug 8
PMID 22868751
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CONTEXT The substantial changes in adolescent alcohol use prevalence over time suggest that population-level environmental factors are important determinants of use, yet the potential influence of such environmental factors is inadequately understood. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether adolescents in birth cohorts and/or time periods characterized by restrictive social norms toward alcohol were at decreased risk for alcohol use and binge drinking, controlling for individual attitudes (disapproval) toward use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In 32 annual national surveys of US high school students, a total of 967 562 students contributed outcome data from 1976 through 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Frequency of past-year alcohol use and any instance of binge drinking (≥5 drinks) in the past 2 weeks, analyzed using multilevel models clustering individuals within periods and birth cohorts. Period- and cohort-specific social norm scores (indicating the proportion disapproving of weekend binge drinking) were modeled as predictors, controlling for individual attitudes and demographic characteristics. RESULTS Individuals who matured in birth cohorts with more restrictive social norms were less likely to use alcohol compared with individuals who matured in cohorts with more permissive norms; each 5% increase in the cohort-specific disapproval was associated with a 12% decrease in the odds of past-year alcohol use (odds ratio = 0.88; 99% CI, 0.87-0.89). The effects of cohort-specific disapproval were notably stronger among white adolescents than nonwhite adolescents. CONCLUSIONS This study documents the importance of considering time-varying population-level risk factors in the study of adolescent alcohol use and indicates that, even after an individual's personal attitudes are accounted for, risk is shaped by cohort effects whereby the norms within the cohort contribute to the risk of adolescent alcohol use.

Citing Articles

Alcohol use among populations with autism spectrum disorder: narrative systematic review.

Barber W, Aslan B, Meynen T, Marsden J, Chamberlain S, Paleri V BJPsych Open. 2025; 11(1):e15.

PMID: 39801022 PMC: 11736162. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.824.


Modeling to explore and challenge inherent assumptions when cultural norms have changed: a case study on left-handedness and life expectancy.

Ferres J, Nasir M, Bijral A, Subramanian S, Weeks W Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):137.

PMID: 37495995 PMC: 10369838. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01156-6.


Can Social Norms Explain Long-Term Trends in Alcohol Use? Insights from Inverse Generative Social Science.

Vu T, Buckley C, Duro J, Brennan A, Epstein J, Purshouse R J Artif Soc Soc Simul. 2023; 26(2).

PMID: 37235176 PMC: 10210583. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.5077.


Young people's explanations for the decline in youth drinking in England.

Whitaker V, Curtis P, Fairbrother H, Oldham M, Holmes J BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):402.

PMID: 36850006 PMC: 9972726. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14760-y.


The contemporary transformation of american youth: An analysis of change in the prevalence of delinquency, 1991-2015.

Baumer E, Cundiff K, Luo L Criminology. 2023; 59(1):109-136.

PMID: 36776699 PMC: 9910102. DOI: 10.1111/1745-9125.12264.


References
1.
Galea S, Hall C, Kaplan G . Social epidemiology and complex system dynamic modelling as applied to health behaviour and drug use research. Int J Drug Policy. 2008; 20(3):209-16. PMC: 2782722. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.08.005. View

2.
Brook J, Nomura C, Cohen P . A network of influences on adolescent drug involvement: neighborhood, school, peer, and family. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1989; 115(1):123-45. View

3.
Gillmore M, Wells E, SIMPSON E, Morrison D, Hoppe M, Wilsdon A . Children's beliefs about drinking. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1998; 24(1):131-51. DOI: 10.3109/00952999809001703. View

4.
Reither E, Hauser R, Yang Y . Do birth cohorts matter? Age-period-cohort analyses of the obesity epidemic in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69(10):1439-48. PMC: 2782961. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.040. View

5.
Bachman J, OMalley P, Johnston L, Schulenberg J, Wallace J . Racial/ethnic differences in the relationship between parental education and substance use among U.S. 8th-, 10th-, and 12th-grade students: findings from the Monitoring the Future project. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011; 72(2):279-85. PMC: 3052897. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.279. View