» Articles » PMID: 22866891

DRIFT: an Analysis of Outcome Framing in Intertemporal Choice

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Aug 8
PMID 22866891
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People prefer to receive good outcomes immediately rather than wait, and they must be compensated for waiting. But what influences their decision about how much compensation is required for a given wait? To give a partial answer to this question, we develop the DRIFT model, a heuristic description of how framing influences intertemporal choice. We describe 4 experiments showing the implications of this model. In the experiments, we vary how the difference between a smaller sooner outcome and a larger later outcome is framed-either as total interest earned, as an interest rate, or as total amount earned (the conventional frame in studies of intertemporal choice)-and whether the larger later outcome is described as resulting from the investment of the smaller sooner one. These alternate frames have several effects. First, the investment language increases patience. Second, the explicit provision of the (otherwise implicit) experimental interest rate sharply reduces the magnitude effect. Correspondingly, we find that interest frames increase patience when the rewards are small, but they decrease patience when they are large. Third, the interest-rate frame induces somewhat greater discounting for longer time periods and, thus, reverses the common finding of "hyperbolic" discounting. Thus, many of the "stylized facts" implied by studies involving choices between a smaller sooner and a larger later amount are eliminated or reverse under alternate outcome frames.

Citing Articles

Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward.

Markman M, Saruco E, Al-Bas S, Wang B, Rose J, Ohla K eNeuro. 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38569920 PMC: 10993202. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0153-23.2024.


The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye-tracking study.

Keidel K, Schroder R, Trautner P, Radbruch A, Murawski C, Ettinger U Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(3):e26585.

PMID: 38401135 PMC: 10893971. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26585.


The effect of psychological distance on intertemporal choice of the reward processing: an eye-tracking investigation.

Li Y, Chu X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1275484.

PMID: 38356761 PMC: 10864453. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1275484.


Measuring Time Preferences.

Cohen J, Ericson K, Laibson D, White J J Econ Lit. 2023; 58(2):299-347.

PMID: 37691693 PMC: 10489299. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20191074.


View of Times and Temporal Focus under the Pace of Life on the Impact of Intertemporal Decision Making.

Wang Y, Wang X, Yang X, Yuan F, Li Y Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36901309 PMC: 10001948. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054301.