» Articles » PMID: 22866761

Flicker Adaptation of Low-level Cortical Visual Neurons Contributes to Temporal Dilation

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Aug 8
PMID 22866761
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several seconds of adaptation to a flickered stimulus causes a subsequent brief static stimulus to appear longer in duration. Nonsensory factors, such as increased arousal and attention, have been thought to mediate this flicker-based temporal-dilation aftereffect. In this study, we provide evidence that adaptation of low-level cortical visual neurons contributes to this aftereffect. The aftereffect was significantly reduced by a 45° change in Gabor orientation between adaptation and test. Because orientation-tuning bandwidths are smaller in lower-level cortical visual areas and are approximately 45° in human V1, the result suggests that flicker adaptation of orientation-tuned V1 neurons contributes to the temporal-dilation aftereffect. The aftereffect was abolished when the adaptor and test stimuli were presented to different eyes. Because eye preferences are strong in V1 but diminish in higher-level visual areas, the eye specificity of the aftereffect corroborates the involvement of low-level cortical visual neurons. Our results suggest that flicker adaptation of low-level cortical visual neurons contributes to expanding visual duration. Furthermore, this temporal-dilation aftereffect dissociates from the previously reported temporal-compression aftereffect on the basis of the differences in their orientation and flicker-frequency selectivity, suggesting that the visual system possesses at least two distinct and potentially complementary mechanisms for adaptively coding perceived duration.

Citing Articles

Stimulus (dis)similarity can modify the effect of a task-irrelevant sandwiching stimulus on the perceived duration of brief visual stimuli.

Asaoka R Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(3):889-903.

PMID: 36795125 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06564-2.


Adaptation reveals multi-stage coding of visual duration.

Heron J, Fulcher C, Collins H, Whitaker D, Roach N Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):3016.

PMID: 30816131 PMC: 6395619. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37614-3.


Relative Time Compression for Slow-Motion Stimuli through Rapid Recalibration.

Kashiwakura S, Motoyoshi I Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1195.

PMID: 28769841 PMC: 5511836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01195.


Multiple channels of visual time perception.

Bruno A, Cicchini G Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016; 8:131-139.

PMID: 28018946 PMC: 5178882. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.028.


Flickering task-irrelevant distractors induce dilation of target duration depending upon cortical distance.

Okajima M, Yotsumoto Y Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32432.

PMID: 27577614 PMC: 5006241. DOI: 10.1038/srep32432.


References
1.
Haynes J, Rees G . Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(5):686-91. DOI: 10.1038/nn1445. View

2.
Treisman M . Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". Psychol Monogr. 1963; 77(13):1-31. DOI: 10.1037/h0093864. View

3.
Wearden J, Edwards H, Fakhri M, Percival A . Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1998; 51(2):97-120. DOI: 10.1080/713932672. View

4.
Burr D, Cicchini G, Arrighi R, Morrone M . Spatiotopic selectivity of adaptation-based compression of event duration. J Vis. 2011; 11(2):21. DOI: 10.1167/11.2.21. View

5.
Penton-Voak I, Edwards H, Percival A, Wearden J . Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996; 22(3):307-20. DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.22.3.307. View