» Articles » PMID: 22862854

Soft Tissue Response to Zirconia and Titanium Implant Abutments: an in Vivo Within-subject Comparison

Overview
Date 2012 Aug 7
PMID 22862854
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To compare the health of the soft tissues towards zirconia and titanium abutments in man, as observed using histological data.

Material And Methods: Twenty patients received two mandibular implants with either a zirconia or titanium abutment (split mouth study design, left-right randomization). After 3 months soft tissue biopsies were prepared for histological evaluation. They were subjected to blind evaluation. The number of blood vessels per surface unit and an inflammation grading scale score ranging from 1 to 4 were determined.

Results: Paired samples from 17 patients were suitable for analysis, 3 with unsevered implant-abutment connections and 14 solely containing soft tissue. All showed a well-keratinized stratified squamous epithelium which was continuous with the barrier (junctional) epithelium that faced the abutment surface. The normal epithelial build-up could be recognized with little signs of inflammation. No statistically significant difference in tissues adjacent to zirconia and titanium abutment surfaces were seen with respect to vascular density (20.5 SD 4.4 and 20.7 SD 3.2) or inflammation grading scale scores (3.2 SD 0.7 versus 3.1 SD 0.7).

Conclusion: No differences in soft tissue health were seen in peri-implant mucosa adjacent to zirconia and titanium abutment surfaces.

Citing Articles

Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in Contact with Zirconium/Titanium Abutments from Histological and Biological Perspectives: A Concise Review.

Abouel Maaty F, Ragab M, El-Ghazawy Y, Elfaiedi F, Abbass M, Radwan I Cells. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39851556 PMC: 11763997. DOI: 10.3390/cells14020129.


Comparison of Microbiota in Zirconia and Titanium Implants: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Bonyadi Manesh M, Vatankhah N, Bonyadi Manesh F Int Dent J. 2024; 75(1):51-58.

PMID: 39237398 PMC: 11806319. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.08.001.


Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample.

Sabau D, Juncar R, Moca A, Bota T, Moca R, Juncar M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38542018 PMC: 10971296. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061794.


Zirconia Dental Implants as a Different Alternative to Titanium: A Literature Review.

Chile J, Dolores A, Espinoza-Carhuancho F, Alvitez-Temoche D, Munive-Degregori A, Barja-Ore J J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2023; 13(5):357-364.

PMID: 38124726 PMC: 10729883. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_104_23.


Immunohistochemical analysis of soft tissue response to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium healing abutments on dental implants: a randomized pilot clinical study.

Milinkovic I, Djinic Krasavcevic A, Jankovic S, Sopta J, Aleksic Z BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):484.

PMID: 36368972 PMC: 9652880. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02536-0.