» Articles » PMID: 22858699

Qualitative SEM/EDS Analysis of Microleakage and Apical Gap Formation of Adhesive Root-filling Materials

Overview
Journal J Appl Oral Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Aug 4
PMID 22858699
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the correspondence between gap formation and apical microleakage in root canals filled with epoxy resin-based (AH Plus) combined or not with resinous primer or with a dimethacrylate-based root canal sealer (Epiphany).

Material And Methods: Thirty-nine lower single-rooted human premolars were filled by the lateral condensation technique (LC) and immersed in a 50-wt% aqueous silver nitrate solution at 37ºC (24 h). After longitudinal sectioning, epoxy resin replicas were made from the tooth specimens. Both the replicas and the specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The gaps were observed in the replicas. Apical microleakage was detected in the specimens by SEM/energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). The data were analyzed statistically using an Ordinal Logistic Regression model and Analysis of Correspondence (α=0.05).

Results: Epiphany presented more regions containing gaps between dentin and sealer (p<0.05). There was correspondence between the presence of gaps and microleakage (p<0.05). Microleakage was similar among the root-filling materials (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The resinous primer did not improve the sealing ability of AH Plus sealer and the presence of gaps had an effect on apical microleakage for all materials.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Apical Sealing Capacity of ActiV GP/Glass Ionomer Sealer Versus Resilon/RealSeal and Gutta Percha/AH plus Sealers.

Khanvilkar U, Dundappa J, Chaubey N, Jha A, Paliwal A, Kumar R Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e49931.

PMID: 38179360 PMC: 10764297. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49931.


Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques.

ArRejaie A, Alsuliman S, Aljohani M, Altamimi H, AlShwaimi E, Al-Thobity A Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31(2):236-241.

PMID: 30983834 PMC: 6445436. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001.


An in vitro Comparison of Bond Strength of Different Sealers/Obturation Systems to Root Dentin Using the Push-Out Test at 2 Weeks and 3 Months after Obturation.

Yap W, Che Ab Aziz Z, Azami N, Al-Haddad A, Khan A Med Princ Pract. 2017; 26(5):464-469.

PMID: 28934753 PMC: 5757529. DOI: 10.1159/000481623.


Bond strength to root dentin and fluid filtration test of AH Plus/gutta-percha, EndoREZ and RealSeal systems.

Mahdi A, Bolanos-Carmona V, Gonzalez-Lopez S J Appl Oral Sci. 2013; 21(4):369-75.

PMID: 24037078 PMC: 3881891. DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130114.

References
1.
Paque F, Sirtes G . Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta-percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16-months leakage. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(9):722-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01298.x. View

2.
Mannocci F, Ferrari M . Apical seal of roots obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha, epoxy resin cement, and dentin bonding agent. J Endod. 1998; 24(1):41-4. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80212-4. View

3.
Van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P . Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(3):215-35. View

4.
Youngson C, Jones J, Manogue M, SMITH I . In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies. Int Endod J. 1998; 31(2):90-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00132.x. View

5.
Dultra F, Barroso J, Carrasco L, Capelli A, Guerisoli D, Pecora J . Evaluation of apical microleakage of teeth sealed with four different root canal sealers. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008; 14(5):341-5. PMC: 4327225. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000500008. View