Effect of Resident Postgraduate Year on Outcomes After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Children
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if the postgraduate level of resident in the operating room correlates with outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
Subjects And Methods: The charts of all children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis from 2007 to 2011 at a free-standing children's hospital were reviewed. Outcomes of interest were compared between patient groups based on postgraduate level of the junior-most surgeon in the operating room: (1) junior resident (postgraduate year [PGY]-1, -2, and -3); (2) senior resident (PGY-4 or -5); (3) fellow (PGY-6 or -7); or (4) attending surgeon only.
Results: Junior resident (n=327), senior resident (n=129), fellow (n=246), and attending (n=73) groups were similar in terms of age (P=.69), gender distribution (P=.51), race (P=.08), and perforation status (P=.30). Operative time was shorter for senior residents (P=.002), fellows (P<.001), and attending surgeons operating without a resident (P<.001) compared with cases with junior residents. The rate of conversion to an open operation was similar among groups (P=.46). Resident level was not predictive of complications, which occurred in 26 junior resident cases (8.0%; referent), 17 senior resident cases (13.2%; odds ratio [OR] 1.73; P=.11), 33 fellow cases (13.4%; OR 1.71; P=.06), and 8 attending cases (11.0%; OR 1.62; P=.27). Fellow involvement was associated with an increased rate of postoperative percutaneous abscess drainage or re-operation for abscess or bowel obstruction (9.8%; OR 2.31; P=.020).
Conclusions: Involvement of junior residents in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with increased operative time but no higher rate of complications.
Bentan M, Mastoloni E, Lee L, Nord R PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317381.
PMID: 39804892 PMC: 11729955. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317381.
Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Carr R, Chung C, Schmidt 2nd C, Jester A, Kilbane M, House M J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21(6):1025-1030.
PMID: 28194616 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3383-4.
A call for a standardized definition of perforated appendicitis.
Rogers A, Zens T, Leys C, Nichol P, Ostlie D J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 52(1):89-92.
PMID: 27884453 PMC: 5502110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.026.
Factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes among obstetrics trainees.
Aiken C, Aiken A, Park H, Brockelsby J, Prentice A Med Educ. 2015; 49(7):674-83.
PMID: 26077215 PMC: 4731334. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12741.
On-table urethral catheterisation during laparoscopic appendicectomy: Is it necessary?.
Nason G, Baig S, Burke M, Aslam A, Kelly M, Walsh L Can Urol Assoc J. 2015; 9(1-2):55-8.
PMID: 25737758 PMC: 4336032. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2341.