High Diagnostic Accuracy of Subcutaneous Triptorelin Test Compared with GnRH Test for Diagnosing Central Precocious Puberty in Girls
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Context: The GnRH test is the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis of central precocious puberty (CPP); however, this compound is not always readily available. Diagnostic accuracy of subcutaneous GnRH analogues tests compared to classical GnRH test has not been reported.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Triptorelin test (index test) compared to the GnRH test (reference test) in girls with suspicion of CPP.
Design: A prospective, case-control, randomized clinical trial was performed. CPP or precocious thelarche (PT) was diagnosed according to maximal LH response to GnRH test and clinical characteristics during follow-up.
Patients And Interventions: Forty-six girls with premature breast development randomly underwent two tests: (i) intravenous GnRH 100 μg, (ii) subcutaneous Triptorelin acetate (0.1 mg/m(2), to a maximum of 0.1 mg) with blood sampling at 0, 3 and 24 h for LH, FSH and estradiol ascertainment.
Measurements: Gonadotrophins and estradiol responses to Triptorelin test were measured by ultrasensitive assays.
Results: Clinical features were similar between CPP (n = 33) and PT (n = 13) groups. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, maximal LH response (LH-3 h) under Triptorelin test ≥ 7 IU/l by immunofluorometric assay (IFMA) or ≥ 8 IU/l by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) confirmed the diagnosis of CPP with specificity of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00) and sensitivity 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58-0.89). Considering either LH-3 h or maximal estradiol response at 24 h (cut-off value, 295 pm), maintaining the specificity at 1.00, the test sensitivity increased to 0.94 (95% CI: 0.80-0.99) and the diagnostic efficiency to 96%.
Conclusion: The Triptorelin test had high accuracy for the differential diagnosis of CPP vs PT in girls providing a valid alternative to the classical GnRH test. This test also allowed a comprehensive evaluation of the pituitary-ovarian axis.
Maddalo M, Petraroli M, Ormitti F, Fulgoni A, Gnocchi M, Masetti M Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1496554.
PMID: 39974824 PMC: 11835667. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1496554.
Critical appraisal of diagnostic laboratory tests in the evaluation of central precocious puberty.
Bangalore Krishna K, Garibaldi L Front Pediatr. 2025; 12:1504874.
PMID: 39911767 PMC: 11795171. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1504874.
Cavarzere P, Sandri M, Arrigoni M, Guardo C, Gaudino R, Antoniazzi F Endocrine. 2024; 87(2):842-849.
PMID: 39382826 PMC: 11811446. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-024-04055-0.
Kim Y, Hwangbo J, Park K, Kang E, Nam H, Rhie Y Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 29(2):90-94.
PMID: 38712492 PMC: 11076232. DOI: 10.6065/apem.2346054.027.
Zhang M, Sun J, Wang Y, Wu Y, Li X, Li R Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 14:1273170.
PMID: 38317710 PMC: 10840421. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1273170.