» Articles » PMID: 22843446

Cost-effectiveness of Optimizing Prevention in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: the EUROASPIRE III Health Economics Project

Overview
Journal Eur Heart J
Date 2012 Jul 31
PMID 22843446
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The EUROASPIRE III survey indicated that the guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention are poorly implemented in patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). The purpose of this health economic project was to assess the potential clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of optimizing cardiovascular prevention in eight EUROASPIRE III countries (Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, France, Italy, Poland, and the U.K.). METHODS AND RESULTS The individual risk for subsequent cardiovascular events was estimated, based on published Framingham equations. Based on the EUROASPIRE III data, the type of suboptimal prevention, if any, was identified for each individual, and the effects of optimized tailored prevention (smoking cessation, diet and exercise, better management of elevated blood pressure and/or LDL-cholesterol) were estimated. Costs of prevention and savings of avoided events were based on country-specific data. A willingness to pay threshold of €30,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was used. The robustness of the results was validated by sensitivity analyses. Overall, the cost-effectiveness analyses for the eight countries showed mainly favourable results with an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €12,484 per QALY. Only in the minority of patients at the lowest risk for recurrent events, intensifying preventive therapy seems not cost-effective. Also, the single impact of intensified cholesterol control seems less cost-effective, possibly because their initial 2-year risk was already fairly low, hence the room for improvement is rather limited.

Conclusion: These results underscore the societal value of optimizing prevention in most patients with established CHD, but also highlight the need for setting priorities towards patients more at risk and the need for more studies comparing intensified prevention with usual care in these patients.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of applying high-sensitivity troponin I to a score for cardiovascular risk prediction in asymptomatic population.

Julicher P, Makarova N, Ojeda F, Giusepi I, Peters A, Thorand B PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307468.

PMID: 39028718 PMC: 11259308. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307468.


Effectiveness of an Interactive mHealth App (EVITE) in Improving Lifestyle After a Coronary Event: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bernal-Jimenez M, Calle G, Gutierrez Barrios A, Gheorghe L, Cruz-Cobo C, Trujillo-Garrido N JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e48756.

PMID: 38648103 PMC: 11074898. DOI: 10.2196/48756.


A cost-effectiveness evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin I guided voluntary cardiovascular risk assessment program for asymptomatic women in Croatia.

Krstacic G, Julicher P, Krstacic A, Varounis C Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2024; 20:200244.

PMID: 38476975 PMC: 10928367. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200244.


Cost-utility of real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with insulin-treated Type II diabetes in France.

Alshannaq H, Pollock R, Joubert M, Ahmed W, Norman G, Lynch P J Comp Eff Res. 2024; 13(3):e230174.

PMID: 38294332 PMC: 10945438. DOI: 10.57264/cer-2023-0174.


Machine learning models in predicting health care costs in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A prospective pilot study.

Hautala A, Shavazipour B, Afsar B, Tulppo M, Miettinen K Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2023; 4(4):137-142.

PMID: 37600445 PMC: 10435951. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.05.001.