» Articles » PMID: 22840314

Comparison of Enzootic Risk Measures for Predicting West Nile Disease, Los Angeles, California, USA, 2004-2010

Overview
Date 2012 Jul 31
PMID 22840314
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Los Angeles, California, USA, 2 epidemics of West Nile virus (WNV) disease have occurred since WNV was recognized in 2003. To assess which measure of risk was most predictive of human cases, we compared 3 measures: the California Mosquito-Borne Virus Surveillance and Response Plan Assessment, the vector index, and the Dynamic Continuous-Area Space-Time system. A case-crossover study was performed by using symptom onset dates from 384 persons with WNV infection to determine their relative environmental exposure to high-risk conditions as measured by each method. Receiver-operating characteristic plots determined thresholds for each model, and the area under the curve was used to compare methods. We found that the best risk assessment model for human WNV cases included surveillance data from avian, mosquito, and climate sources.

Citing Articles

Epidemic versus endemic West Nile virus dead bird surveillance in California: Changes in sensitivity and focus.

Foss L, Feiszli T, Kramer V, Reisen W, Padgett K PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284039.

PMID: 37023091 PMC: 10079120. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284039.


A systematic review of published literature on mosquito control action thresholds across the world.

Aryaprema V, Steck M, Peper S, Xue R, Qualls W PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023; 17(3):e0011173.

PMID: 36867651 PMC: 10016652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011173.


Evaluation of the effectiveness of the California mosquito-borne virus surveillance & response plan, 2009-2018.

Danforth M, Snyder R, Lonstrup E, Barker C, Kramer V PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022; 16(5):e0010375.

PMID: 35533207 PMC: 9119623. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010375.


A proposed framework for the development and qualitative evaluation of West Nile virus models and their application to local public health decision-making.

Keyel A, Gorris M, Rochlin I, Uelmen J, Chaves L, Hamer G PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021; 15(9):e0009653.

PMID: 34499656 PMC: 8428767. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009653.


Mosquito blood-feeding patterns and nesting behavior of American crows, an amplifying host of West Nile virus.

Wheeler S, Taff C, Reisen W, Townsend A Parasit Vectors. 2021; 14(1):331.

PMID: 34158103 PMC: 8220764. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04827-x.


References
1.
Johnson K . The two by two diagram: a graphical truth table. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(11):1073-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00087-6. View

2.
Kramer L, Styer L, Ebel G . A global perspective on the epidemiology of West Nile virus. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 53:61-81. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093258. View

3.
Eidson M, Kramer L, Stone W, Hagiwara Y, Schmit K . Dead bird surveillance as an early warning system for West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001; 7(4):631-5. PMC: 2631773. DOI: 10.3201/eid0704.010405. View

4.
Theophilides C, Ahearn S, Grady S, Merlino M . Identifying West Nile virus risk areas: the Dynamic Continuous-Area Space-Time system. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157(9):843-54. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg046. View

5.
. Update: West Nile virus screening of blood donations and transfusion-associated transmission--United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004; 53(13):281-4. View