» Articles » PMID: 22836871

Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Refractory Epilepsy: the Surgical Procedure and Complications in 100 Implantations by a Single Medical Center

Overview
Date 2012 Jul 28
PMID 22836871
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 1997, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of intermittent stimulation of the left vagal nerve as adjunctive therapy for seizure control. Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has since been considered a safe and effective treatment for medically intractable seizures. The objective of this study is to present our experience with the surgical procedure and outcomes after VNS insertion in the first 100 consecutive patients treated at the Tel-Aviv "Sourasky" Medical Center (TASMC). All patients who underwent VNS device implantation by the authors at TASMC between 2005 and 2011 were studied. The collected data included age at onset of epilepsy, seizure type, duration of epilepsy, age at VNS device implantation, seizure reduction, surgical complications, and adverse effects of VNS over time. Fifty-three males and 47 females, age 21.2 ± 11.1 years, underwent VNS implantation. Indications for surgery were medically refractory epilepsy. The most common seizure type was focal (55 patients, 55 %). Seizure duration until implantation was 14.4 ± 9 years. Mean follow-up time after device insertion was 24.5 ± 22 months. Complications were encountered in 12 patients. The most common complication was local infection (6 patients, 6 %). Six devices were removed-four due to infection and two due to loss of clinical effect. Currently, 63 patients remain in active long-term follow-up; of these, 35 patients have >50 % reduction in frequency of attacks.VNS is a well-tolerated and effective therapeutic alternative in the management of medically refractory epilepsy. The surgical procedure is safe and has a low complication rate.

Citing Articles

Complete section of the left vagus nerve does not preclude the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation: illustrative case.

Noris A, Roncon P, Peraio S, Zicca A, Lenge M, Di Rita A J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022; 2(3):CASE21128.

PMID: 35854913 PMC: 9265221. DOI: 10.3171/CASE21128.


Management and outcome of vagus nerve stimulator implantation: experience of an otolaryngeal/neuropediatric cooperation.

Grasl S, Janik S, Dressler A, Diehm R, Groppel G, Eichinger K Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 278(10):3891-3899.

PMID: 34196736 PMC: 8382619. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06943-x.


Late-onset jaw and teeth pain mimicking trigeminal neuralgia associated with chronic vagal nerve stimulation: case series and review of the literature.

Timarova G, Steno A BMC Neurol. 2017; 17(1):113.

PMID: 28619068 PMC: 5473002. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-017-0892-4.

References
1.
Murphy J, Torkelson R, Dowler I, Simon S, Hudson S . Vagal nerve stimulation in refractory epilepsy: the first 100 patients receiving vagal nerve stimulation at a pediatric epilepsy center. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157(6):560-4. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.6.560. View

2.
Saneto R, Sotero de Menezes M, Ojemann J, Bournival B, Murphy P, Cook W . Vagus nerve stimulation for intractable seizures in children. Pediatr Neurol. 2006; 35(5):323-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2006.06.005. View

3.
Smyth M, Tubbs R, Bebin E, Grabb P, Blount J . Complications of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy in children. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(3):500-3. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0500. View

4.
Englot D, Chang E, Auguste K . Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response. J Neurosurg. 2011; 115(6):1248-55. DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.JNS11977. View

5.
Ardesch J, Buschman H, Wagener-Schimmel L, van der Aa H, Hageman G . Vagus nerve stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study. Seizure. 2007; 16(7):579-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.005. View