» Articles » PMID: 22832144

Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the Diagnosis of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: Preliminary Results

Overview
Journal Clin Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Jul 27
PMID 22832144
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic accuracy of two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

Materials And Methods: One hundred and ten consecutive patients with suspicion of endometriosis were recruited at two institutions over a 5-month period. Twenty-three women underwent surgery, 18 had DIE at histology. Two readers independently evaluated 3D and 2D MRI for image quality and diagnosis of DIE. Descriptive analysis, chi-square test for categorical or nominal variables, McNemar test for comparison between 3D and 2D T2-weighted MRI, and weighted "statistics" for intra- and interobserver agreement were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Both readers found that 3D yielded significantly lower image quality than 2D MRI (p < 0.0001). Acquisition time for 3D was significantly shorter than 2D MRI (p < 0.01). 3D offered similar accuracy to diagnose DIE compared to 2D MRI. For all locations of endometriosis, a high or variable intra-observer agreement was observed for reader 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusions: Despite a lower overall image quality, 3D provides significant time saving and similar accuracy than multiplanar 2D MRI in the diagnosis of specific DIE locations.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement.

Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(3):hoae029.

PMID: 38812884 PMC: 11134890. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae029.


Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement†,‡.

Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024; 16(2):127-144.

PMID: 38807551 PMC: 11366111. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.16.2.012.


Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of uterosacral ligaments/torus uterinus, rectovaginal septum and vaginal deep endometriosis.

Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M, Mol B, Condous G Hum Reprod Open. 2021; 2021(4):hoab041.

PMID: 34869918 PMC: 8634567. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab041.


Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion technique in gynecology.

Bazot M, Spagnoli F, Guerriero S Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 59(2):141-145.

PMID: 34435404 PMC: 9305114. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24754.


Value of 3D MRI and Vaginal Opacification for the Diagnosis of Vaginal Endometriosis.

Bazot M, Beldjord S, Jarboui L, Ferrier C, Bendifallah S, Darai E Front Surg. 2021; 7:614989.

PMID: 33392249 PMC: 7775563. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.614989.