» Articles » PMID: 22826812

Pitfalls in Precision Stereotactic Surgery

Overview
Journal Surg Neurol Int
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Jul 25
PMID 22826812
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Precision is the ultimate aim of stereotactic technique. Demands on stereotactic precision reach a pinnacle in stereotactic functional neurosurgery. Pitfalls are best avoided by possessing in-depth knowledge of the techniques employed and the equipment used. The engineering principles of arc-centered stereotactic frames maximize surgical precision at the target, irrespective of the surgical trajectory, and provide the greatest degree of surgical precision in current clinical practice. Stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a method of visualizing intracranial structures and fiducial markers on the same image without introducing significant errors during an image fusion process. Although image distortion may potentially limit the utility of stereotactic MRI, near-complete distortion correction can be reliably achieved with modern machines. Precision is dependent on minimizing errors at every step of the stereotactic procedure. These steps are considered in turn and include frame application, image acquisition, image manipulation, surgical planning of target and trajectory, patient positioning and the surgical procedure itself. Audit is essential to monitor and improve performance in clinical practice. The level of stereotactic precision is best analyzed by routine postoperative stereotactic MRI. This allows the stereotactic and anatomical location of the intervention to be compared with the anatomy and coordinates of the intended target, avoiding significant image fusion errors.

Citing Articles

Launching Stealth AutoGuide robot for stereotactic biopsy procedures in a neurosurgical centre: learning curve and workflow optimization.

Barth M, Holl E, Flaschka F, Karakaya S, Korbler V, Pichlsberger M Front Robot AI. 2025; 11:1437568.

PMID: 39741873 PMC: 11685092. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1437568.


Principles of Stereotactic Surgery.

Jensen M, Neimat J, Kerezoudis P, Ali R, Richardson R, Halpern C Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2024; 28(3):303-321.

PMID: 39627171 PMC: 11809997. DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001422.


Exploring the Connection Between Nanomaterials and Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Nanda S, Yi D Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(11).

PMID: 39597194 PMC: 11596582. DOI: 10.3390/mi15111382.


Comparison meta-analysis of intraoperative MRI-guided needle biopsy versus conventional stereotactic needle biopsies.

Dhawan S, Chen C Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdad129.

PMID: 38187873 PMC: 10771274. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad129.


Computed tomography-guided stereotactic surgery in the management of brain lesions: A single-center experience.

Salah M, Shalaby A Surg Neurol Int. 2023; 14:184.

PMID: 37292393 PMC: 10246346. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_1131_2022.


References
1.
Coffey R, Lunsford L . Stereotactic surgery for mass lesions of the midbrain and pons. Neurosurgery. 1985; 17(1):12-8. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198507000-00003. View

2.
Nathoo N, Cavusoglu M, Vogelbaum M, Barnett G . In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56(3):421-33. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000153929.68024.cf. View

3.
Sumanaweera T, Adler Jr J, Napel S, Glover G . Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implications for stereotactic surgery. Neurosurgery. 1994; 35(4):696-703; discussion 703-4. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199410000-00016. View

4.
Duffner F, Schiffbauer H, Breit S, Friese S, Freudenstein D . Relevance of image fusion for target point determination in functional neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144(5):445-51. DOI: 10.1007/s007010200065. View

5.
Patel N, Plaha P, OSullivan K, McCarter R, Heywood P, Gill S . MRI directed bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003; 74(12):1631-7. PMC: 1757425. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.74.12.1631. View