» Articles » PMID: 22826006

Measuring Cohabitation and Family Structure in the United States: Assessing the Impact of New Data from the Current Population Survey

Overview
Journal Demography
Specialty Public Health
Date 2012 Jul 25
PMID 22826006
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 2007, the Current Population Survey (CPS) introduced a measure that identifies all cohabiting partners in a household, regardless of whether they describe themselves as "unmarried partners" in the relationship to householder question. The CPS now also links children to their biological, step-, and adoptive parents. Using these new variables, we analyze the prevalence of cohabitation as well as the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of different-sex cohabiting couples during the years 2007-2009. Estimates of cohabitation produced using only unmarried partnerships miss 18 % of all cohabiting unions and 12 % of children residing with cohabiting parents. Although differences between unmarried partners and most newly identified cohabitors are small, newly identified cohabitors are older, on average, and are less likely to be raising shared biological or adopted children. These new measures also allow us to identify a small number of young, disadvantaged couples who primarily reside in households of other family members, most commonly with parents. We conclude with an examination of the complex living arrangements and poverty status of American children, demonstrating the broader value of these new measures for research on American family and household structure.

Citing Articles

First Partner Choice in a Native Minority: The Role of Own and Parental Ethnolinguistic Affiliation.

Uggla C, Saarela J Eur J Popul. 2024; 40(1):3.

PMID: 38227147 PMC: 10792144. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-023-09683-2.


A matter of time: Bateman's principles and mating success as count and duration across social strata in contemporary Finland.

Andersson L, Jalovaara M, Saarela J, Uggla C Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2002):20231061.

PMID: 37434521 PMC: 10336387. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1061.


A Research Note Describing a More Inclusive Approach to Identifying Same-Sex Cohabiters in the American Time Use Survey.

Flood S, Genadek K Demography. 2021; 58(6):2029-2040.

PMID: 34541606 PMC: 8633037. DOI: 10.1215/00703370-9510524.


Family Instability in the Lives of American Children.

Cavanagh S, Fomby P Annu Rev Sociol. 2020; 45(1):493-513.

PMID: 32728311 PMC: 7388657. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022633.


Cumulative Effects of Doubling Up in Childhood on Young Adult Outcomes.

Harvey H Demography. 2020; 57(2):501-528.

PMID: 32207060 DOI: 10.1007/s13524-020-00860-0.


References
1.
Kennedy S, Bumpass L . Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demogr Res. 2009; 19:1663-1692. PMC: 2612998. DOI: 10.4054/demres.2008.19.47. View

2.
Guzzo K, Furstenberg Jr F . Multipartnered fertility among young women with a nonmarital first birth: prevalence and risk factors. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007; 39(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1363/3902907. View

3.
Hayford S, Morgan S . The quality of retrospective data on cohabitation. Demography. 2008; 45(1):129-41. PMC: 2722926. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2008.0005. View

4.
Liebler C, Halpern-Manners A . A practical approach to using multiple-race response data: a bridging method for public-use microdata. Demography. 2008; 45(1):143-55. PMC: 2831381. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2008.0004. View

5.
Casper L, Cohen P . How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation. Demography. 2000; 37(2):237-45. View